Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:62777) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RO51S-0001dI-99; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:04:51 -0800 Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7sf2087254wwg.16 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:04:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=V+lvI4gASInbGLnngv7/88vDiPdmO8VMLMgq6uqF9U0=; b=1szT3141pj+MD8YqnJWwhZ+44Xg1vvy1JNwOiVfReK4KZPAtXWvzo2bam5Z++d0ndA XlAuWc18MmfVMCeJ2daMObOrW9zMhm+8k581TkGLh5M+Vw4NuSzwPcHrWgM/zKk0EG3l bhH3wJsPfOJMH8HTBnF1OFpt4pxZ2CDnELlGc= Received: by 10.180.85.233 with SMTP id k9mr321365wiz.2.1320832807164; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.108.135 with SMTP id f7ls70961ebp.2.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.35.202 with SMTP id q10mr582773ebd.0.1320832805980; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.35.202 with SMTP id q10mr582772ebd.0.1320832805935; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t21si4659220faf.0.2011.11.09.02.00.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.52; Received: by mail-fx0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n26so2621910faa.39 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.105.211 with SMTP id go19mr1015086lab.31.1320832805716; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.1.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <17294635.733.1320160412847.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqce21> <15299677.1288.1320305653443.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqnx19> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:00:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A new guide that needs guidance From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083f4b31445104b14a5a51 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d04083f4b31445104b14a5a51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I disagree on both counts. The roman characters are used by a lot of different languages/cultures, for one, and for two, not all writing systems are equally suitable for writing Lojban. I did an orthography for Japanese, and it required a lot of custom rules, as Japanese has no way of writing any ending consonant other than "n", and no way of writing consonant clusters other than doubles, or nC. Chinese is probablly even less suitable. Some are possibly equally suitable- I believe Russian and Arabic scripts work without too much fuss, but not all systems are equally Lojbanic. It's quite possible I'm wrong, but as far as I am aware, Roman script is the only writing system that is multi-linguistic- that is, used by more than one language. On the second point, Tengwar is not the most culturally neutral. It was invented by an English-speaking writer as the script of a fictional race, used to write said race's fictional language. While I'm sure any LoTR fans would love to write Lojban using it, and I know that some people actually have, it is by no means neutral. Just as with the "cultural gismu" this can really only be settled by an all or nothing approach. Either we use a system that is used by "all"- or at least the closest thing to "all"- the script which is the most widely used on this planet, or we use a system that is used by "none"- or at least used by no-one outside of Lojban, such larlermorna (and I'm pretty sure I got the name wrong). Finally, I'm going to quote a wonderfully appropriate cliche- "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Lojban's default- or maybe I should say official- orthography has been Latin script literally since it's birth. And if we count Loglan, since /before/ it's birth, as Loglan's official script - and probably only allowed one- is also Latin. From a purely functional standpoint, it has absolutely no problems. All Lojbanists are perfectly capable of writing and reading Lojban using it. And for those of us who's first language uses a different writing system, yes, it does mean learning another one- but for many foreign languages, this would be the case /anyway/. I'm learning Japanese right now- I have to learn a whole slew of new characters. If I decided to learn Jewish (Yiddish?), Arabic, Russian, etc., those require me to learn a new system as well. It kind of comes with the territory. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Sebastian Fr=C3=B6jd wrote: > I understand that most jbopli today are using the Roman alphabet, and > that's fine, but not really cultural neutral. So I don't understand why > {lo'a} is defined as "shift letterals to *Lojban* (Roman) alphabet." I > think every alphabet should be equally lojbanic, or? If lojban would have= a > default alphabet I think it should be Tengwar, since that's the most > cultural neutral (and also phonetical) alphabet. Anyway, I'm already usin= g > tengwar sometimes, so I really think it would be nice to have a BY1 for > tengwar also. Maybe {te'i}? > mu'o mi'e jongausib > > > 2011/11/8 Michael Turniansky > >> No, they ALL are....the je'o, ga'e, jo'o, etc. simply specify the contex= t >> of what follows. The fact that we normally default to a lo'a context is >> simply convention. I could have had any number of other lerfu, PA, heck, >> even whole paragraphs after using "je'o" before using the "kybu" and it >> would meant "=D7=A7", and not "q" >> --gejyspa >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote= : >> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Michael Turniansky < >>> mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/11/3 Jonathan Jones >>>> >>>>> 2011/11/3 M. Nael >>>>> >>>>> We do. The name of Q is "kybu". >>>>>> >>>>>> I meant more distinctive names, as per the example I mentioned for >>>>>> Arabic =D8=AC >>>>>> >>>>> I don't know what you mean by distinctive. Each name is associated >>>>> with exactly one thing. .uibu, for example, is the name of ":)". You = can't >>>>> use .uibu to refer to anything else. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Well, that's not exactly true. Depends on context. For example ky >>>> bu is q, ga'e ky bu is Q, je'o ky bu is =D7=A7 and presumably jo'o ky= bu is =D9=82 >>>> (forgive me if I have that wrong, Muhammad) >>>> >>>> --gejyspa >>>> >>> >>> Every one of those examples is different, gejyspa, and illustrates what >>> I said perfectly. {je'o ky. bu} is not {ky bu}. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --f46d04083f4b31445104b14a5a51 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I disagree on both counts.

The roman characters are used by a lot of= different languages/cultures, for one, and for two, not all writing system= s are equally suitable for writing Lojban. I did an orthography for Japanes= e, and it required a lot of custom rules, as Japanese has no way of writing= any ending consonant other than "n", and no way of writing conso= nant clusters other than doubles, or nC. Chinese is probablly even less sui= table. Some are possibly equally suitable- I believe Russian and Arabic scr= ipts work without too much fuss, but not all systems are equally Lojbanic. = It's quite possible I'm wrong, but as far as I am aware, Roman scri= pt is the only writing system that is multi-linguistic- that is, used by mo= re than one language.

On the second point, Tengwar is not the most culturally neutral. It was= invented by an English-speaking writer as the script of a fictional race, = used to write said race's fictional language. While I'm sure any Lo= TR fans would love to write Lojban using it, and I know that some people ac= tually have, it is by no means neutral.

Just as with the "cultural gismu" this can really only be set= tled by an all or nothing approach. Either we use a system that is used by = "all"- or at least the closest thing to "all"- the scri= pt which is the most widely used on this planet, or we use a system that is= used by "none"- or at least used by no-one outside of Lojban, su= ch larlermorna (and I'm pretty sure I got the name wrong).

Finally, I'm going to quote a wonderfully appropriate cliche- "= ;If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Lojban's default- or ma= ybe I should say official- orthography has been Latin script literally sinc= e it's birth. And if we count Loglan, since /before/ it's birth, as= Loglan's official script - and probably only allowed one- is also Lati= n. From a purely functional standpoint, it has absolutely no problems. All = Lojbanists are perfectly capable of writing and reading Lojban using it. An= d for those of us who's first language uses a different writing system,= yes, it does mean learning another one- but for many foreign languages, th= is would be the case /anyway/. I'm learning Japanese right now- I have = to learn a whole slew of new characters. If I decided to learn Jewish (Yidd= ish?), Arabic, Russian, etc., those require me to learn a new system as wel= l. It kind of comes with the territory.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Sebastian Fr= =C3=B6jd <so.= cool.ogi@gmail.com> wrote:
I understand that most jbopli today are using the Roman alphabet, and that&= #39;s fine, but not really cultural neutral. So I don't understand why = {lo'a} is defined as "shift letterals to Lojban (Roman) alp= habet." I think every alphabet should be equally lojbanic, or? If lojb= an would have a default alphabet I think it should be Tengwar, since that&#= 39;s the most cultural neutral (and also phonetical) alphabet. Anyway, I= 9;m already using tengwar sometimes, so I really think it would be nice to = have a BY1 for tengwar also. Maybe {te'i}?
mu'o mi'e jongausib


2011/11/8 Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.c= om>
No, they ALL are....the je'o, ga'e, jo'o,= etc. simply specify the context of what follows.=C2=A0 The fact that we no= rmally default to a lo'a context is simply convention. I could have had= any number of other lerfu, PA, heck, even whole=C2=A0paragraphs after usin= g "je'o" before using the "kybu" and it would meant= "=D7=A7", and not "q"
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 --gejyspa


=C2=A0
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Jones <= span dir=3D"ltr"><eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Michael Turnians= ky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:


2011/11/3 Jonathan Jones <<= a href=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">eyeonus@gmail.com= >
2011/11/3 M. Nael <muhammad.nael@gmail.c= om>

We do. The name = of Q is "kybu".
I meant more distinctive names, as per the example I mentioned for Ara= bic =D8=AC
I don't know what you mean by distinctive. Each name is associated= with exactly one thing. .uibu, for example, is the name of ":)".= You can't use .uibu to refer to anything else.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 Well, that's not exactly true.=C2=A0 = Depends on context.=C2=A0 For example ky bu is q, ga'e ky bu is Q, je&#= 39;o ky bu is=C2=A0 =D7=A7 and presumably jo'o ky bu is=C2=A0=D9=82 (fo= rgive me if I have that wrong, Muhammad)
=C2=A0
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 --gejyspa

Every one of those examples is diffe= rent, gejyspa, and illustrates what I said perfectly. {je'o ky. bu} is = not {ky bu}.=20


--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e= 9;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(C= ome to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G= oogle Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email= to lojban@goo= glegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.= com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d04083f4b31445104b14a5a51--