Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:39873)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WENH96fUEGgShs1GD@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RO87t-0003yA-Mo; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:48 -0800
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33sf105227pzk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-disposition;
        bh=O1pEIBrjdfmCnu5EKMT16oiSvSY+JlittOKXcOJK4WE=;
        b=XXAakGTDPpSfHpjZNmlfuiQq1GzdV/Xf6M0TjiUclP3tLSwGXFgSjNBCcs7KBJLjAV
         BCssUhsAE/nZjCuWFlZoanEi27kTYNBQHFELGge8PfV5EIa4nPJyKw1zjEb7Zzp0c7in
         1yl7H0BNMyOtSPbCFKARVvnBy6RyXRRR8MEwY=
Received: by 10.68.1.66 with SMTP id 2mr237975pbk.15.1320845009327;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.12.106 with SMTP id x10ls2020437pbb.3.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov
 2011 05:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.50.169 with SMTP id d9mr2174031pbo.0.1320845008734;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.50.169 with SMTP id d9mr2174030pbo.0.1320845008725;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l3si875965pbd.0.2011.11.09.05.23.28
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RO87j-0003y6-9e
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:23:27 -0800
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 05:23:27 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, but general relevance: dai-like cmavo
Message-ID: <20111109132326.GN19979@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAEimHHD32DpyRAA+E5Gf10n4iqViwz6X9Tt8fFMmMg3P1FuHJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMKwHj26HzF4xj00kKDDuku7NCs7oJAnso9fC8gCN_M9UzwCJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <201111090819.17457.phma@phma.optus.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201111090819.17457.phma@phma.optus.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:19:08AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 November 2011 17:53:35 Jonathan Jones wrote:
> > I think, to make things as simple as possible, UI* dai should
> > always mean "You and I UI*", UI* dai nai, "You UI* but I don't",
> > etc. So {o'unai dai} would be "you and I both feel not relaxed".
> 
> I disagree. I think "UI dai nai" says explicitly that my feeling
> of UI is mine alone; to say that my feeling of UI is equal to what
> I feel you (or someone else) feel, I'd say "UI dai cu'i".

Well, {dai nai} isn't currently defined at all.  Since the default
is that you're expressing your own emotions (as I've said elsewhere,
I feel strongly that that's the *only* valid use of bare UI), I'd
rather use {dai nai} for something useful.

-Robin


-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.