Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:45181) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RO92o-0005FC-49; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:33 -0800 Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14sf924030vcb.16 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=02c93rDV9So552GtyGamWR4Za51iY/HCk261f0bXSPE=; b=K1jjQCq6fMIfKfQae+FZ3cNILMVOU+N/tLbJntZQTXqLfaRUGJWGFZJ24jZyoeRvGH mCBjkPKnb2WsvNU/SgjcCo42XfS0fu6ANkc2lAzGASrPHNpo7soYjoGz03acbSQSnCN2 thsZwZn4o5nIDe1SJ4om+yGqSBYVxMnfv6RoM= Received: by 10.52.20.73 with SMTP id l9mr245610vde.15.1320848536820; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.20.204 with SMTP id p12ls930600vde.1.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.30.195 with SMTP id u3mr2686017vdh.3.1320848536173; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.30.195 with SMTP id u3mr2686016vdh.3.1320848536166; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vw0-f42.google.com (mail-vw0-f42.google.com [209.85.212.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c19si2493899vdd.1.2011.11.09.06.22.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.42; Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so1585145vwl.29 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.37 with SMTP id u5mr5024271vds.45.1320848536081; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.182.35 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 06:22:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111109132326.GN19979@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111105115950.GJ8607@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <201111090819.17457.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20111109132326.GN19979@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:22:16 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words, but general relevance: dai-like cmavo From: Craig Daniel To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Well, {dai nai} isn't currently defined at all. =A0Since the default > is that you're expressing your own emotions (as I've said elsewhere, > I feel strongly that that's the *only* valid use of bare UI), I'd > rather use {dai nai} for something useful. Both interpretations make sense to me, and both are useful (and work precisely the same way except for exchanging the meanings of dai and nai dai nai). For any given UI there are four variants of UI dai available: UI dai, UI nai dai, UI dai nai, UI nai dai nai. Obviously UI dai and UI nai dai say the same thing about opposite emotions, and UI dai nai and UI nai dai nai do as well. There are also four meanings for them to cover: we both feel UI (UI dai), we both feel anti-UI (UI nai dai), I'm pretty sure you feel UI but I don't (UI dai nai proposal #1) =3D I alone feel not-UI (UI nai dai nai proposal #2), and I alone feel UI (UI dai nai proposal #2) =3D I'm pretty sure you feel not-UI, but I don't (UI nai dai nai proposal #1). Proposal 2 would also mean the fact that a bare UI is dai-neutral is more relevant. I see no compelling argument for one over the other, but do think there's a slight reason to prefer the first interpretation: I think we're going to say "you probably feel UI about that" a lot more than "I don't care how you feel about it, but I'm pretty UI" for reasons of pragmatics (though both will certainly have their uses). Since the UI are aligned such that people tend to use the positive form more often, UI dai nai should be the one that says something more common about our feeling of UIness. That's a vote for proposal 1, where UI dai nai means "I don't share your UI, but you probably feel UI." - mi'e .kreig. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.