Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:43228) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ROED0-0001eV-Mc; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:53:23 -0800 Received: by ywa17 with SMTP id 17sf1619008ywa.16 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:53:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=xvifBu38mav9Ty8XKgc6aaGjZa/Faevu8CGsaCLV1uk=; b=OlGC6+pb+PQS6T1EI+8VW1z10G9v1RlIHTjweeoagN1lMFm3JY/3HMcjVS7BMiQsHD Rr1zeuVhDa5ipENREXOr7tysJ2vXg79aIa9SkuAPu6ZpK3CuLKuj2ZS63smqjQZmLhJi HM09BylOQt7H/3Mz2fu8dfhXeZ0fpd/Al5hOE= Received: by 10.236.192.228 with SMTP id i64mr1120050yhn.0.1320868389371; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:53:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.182.17 with SMTP id j17ls2136172anp.6.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:53:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.201.227 with SMTP id b63mr1058922yho.6.1320868387806; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:53:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:53:06 -0800 (PST) From: djandus Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <19660674.2035.1320868386739.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqni5> In-Reply-To: References: <1320583059.2268.1.camel@fagricipni-desktop> <19133282.2004.1320862759698.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqhd1> Subject: Re: [lojban] How to Say "is made of"? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jandew@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jandew@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jandew@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2034_5673100.1320868386737" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2034_5673100.1320868386737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I'm saying that aren't the meanings of: .i lo pamoi .i slabu marji lo ratni .i lo remoi .i lo slabu marji ku gunma lo ratni distinct in that the first says "ordinary matter made up of atoms", as if= =20 {lo ratni} is clarifying which kind of ordinary matter we are talking=20 about, and that there are other ordinary matters we aren't talking about=20 that aren't made up of atoms; whereas the second says "ordinary matter is made up of atoms" as a=20 declarative, since the "made up of" part is the selbri. More lojbanically, if I were to compare the masses (the x=E2=82=81s, as it = happens)=20 being discussed in each of these, I would get: .i lo pamoi gunma ku du lo slabu marji be lo ratni .i lo remoi gunma ku du lo slabu marji ku lo gunma be lo ratni where the first is simply talking about a mass of ordinary matter, the kind= =20 made up of atoms, and the second is explicitly saying the mass is the same= =20 as the ordinary matter is the same as the mass made up of cells. I guess my question is, do these hold the meaning differences my mind wants= =20 to give them, or am I missing something? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/FkJm0gJJMBwJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_2034_5673100.1320868386737 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I'm saying that aren't the meanings of:

.i lo pamo= i .i slabu marji lo ratni
.i lo remoi .i lo slabu marji ku g= unma lo ratni

distinct in that the first says "ord= inary matter made up of atoms", as if {lo ratni} is clarifying which kind o= f ordinary matter we are talking about, and that there are other ordinary m= atters we aren't talking about that aren't made up of atoms;
wher= eas the second says "ordinary matter is made up of atoms" as a declarative,= since the "made up of" part is the selbri.
More lojbanically, if= I were to compare the masses (the x=E2=82=81s, as it happens) being discus= sed in each of these, I would get:

.i lo pamoi gun= ma ku du lo slabu marji be lo ratni
.i lo remoi gunma ku du = lo slabu marji ku lo gunma be lo ratni

where = the first is simply talking about a mass of ordinary matter, the kind made = up of atoms, and the second is explicitly saying the mass is the same as th= e ordinary matter is the same as the mass made up of cells.

<= /div>
I guess my question is, do these hold the meaning differences my = mind wants to give them, or am I missing something?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Fk= Jm0gJJMBwJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_2034_5673100.1320868386737--