Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:42061) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ROOpV-0006f7-9b; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:55 -0800 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33sf984605pzk.16 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :sender:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=z88tWidsbxUh++OhVpPd8PvAzysti8DQSjznA6rGkXE=; b=2m8JMPNFi+dAinaaKaIK+eL1T/B6yQSqMdgu6Aftjm9INa1uZZsoX1tNnRHrXJPyQ7 vJvUobMLaAtmbUzD6ZK8C7gVEPtSYaJa1Huxi2nl9+qRq8clzobyh2H/yuACRTO+FUDH x4XlhBYHBV7GowfS+xoPEQ3OEhnB1E/mwvP5s= Received: by 10.68.9.103 with SMTP id y7mr789637pba.7.1320909216518; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:36 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.3.45 with SMTP id 13ls4707782pbz.4.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr4938057pbr.6.1320909215736; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.59.229 with SMTP id c5mr4938056pbr.6.1320909215726; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5si7743667pbe.1.2011.11.09.23.13.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ROOpK-0006f3-Gc for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:13:34 -0800 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:13:34 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Lojban Archivist/Historian, please. (was Re: More about the babies (was Re: [lojban] Help request: move things to github for me.)) Message-ID: <20111110071334.GU19979@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20110927064919.GX18099@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111002005717.GM20043@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111031053206.GC8858@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111101084840.GC15924@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111102053827.GF26004@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111104085404.GW27896@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4EB42ADC.9090501@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4EB42ADC.9090501@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@stodi.digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:11:40PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Michael Turniansky wrote: > >>to mi na se raktu lo nu pilno zo carmi tu'a lo srana be lo nu > >>cinmo to ru'a ra terpro be fi do toi .i zo cai selcmu zo carmi .i > >>lo ka selcni cu ka'e carmi toi > > > >- -------- > > > >x1 is intense/bright/saturated/brilliant in property (ka) x2 as > >received/measured by observer x3. > > > >Also lustrous, gleaming, sparkling, shining (all probably better metaphorically > >combined with gusni: gusycai or camgu'i); in colors, refers principally to > >increased saturation (with opposite kandi). > > > >- -------- > > > >I see a great deal there about light and color, and nothing at all > >about emotion. If you are right, the gismu definition needs > >updating, badly. I use {mutce} for this currently. > > > >Bob, can you comment here? (the question is: can emotions be > >{carmi}?) > > Yes. > > Any property or quality should be able to be described as intense - > referring to relative density of the property. OK, I thought it was only about light. Good to know. What do you think of xorxes' summary of that and similar issues, pasted here?: .i va'o lo nu ko'a tsali fo'a cu nandu fa lo nu gasnu lo nu ko'a jdika fo'a .i va'o lo nu ko'a carmi fo'a cu nandu fa lo nu na ganse lo nu ko'a ckaji fo'a .i va'o lo nu ko'a mutce fo'a cu nandu fa lo nu tolcri lo zmadu be ko'a bei fo'a I can translate if you like. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.