Received: from mail-yx0-f184.google.com ([209.85.213.184]:64692) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ROb7Q-0006ND-4e; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:21:13 -0800 Received: by yenr9 with SMTP id r9sf1435302yen.1 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=wInw1ebdAD5E2nW8qFGfkmVitKDqtiGIDrEBSECi9r0=; b=2gHIDyUahnJBXuNXcri9pli2Fq0SNSDOLK7p6yEFw/K0oKB14oyDBsu74sh8QrMwc6 mLYdRqdX3eoQHUXVKlOEmsSZ4W7Yo4buoP6LwBQljnHcYZEjWEjEzjVOGLEWPkdykBWX qKn03nfvDAYHYIH4+g4mk671XoWlZT6I4a/kQ= Received: by 10.236.154.131 with SMTP id h3mr2457864yhk.13.1320956454879; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.2.12 with SMTP id e12ls4566542ani.3.gmail; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.73.11 with SMTP id a11mr1990642anl.37.1320956453449; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.73.11 with SMTP id a11mr1990640anl.37.1320956453421; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com (mail-gx0-f176.google.com [209.85.161.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f15si3647078anq.1.2011.11.10.12.20.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.176; Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so3975246ggn.35 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.237.19 with SMTP id k19mr3868783anh.163.1320956453163; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.5 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:20:32 -0800 (PST) From: Luke Bergen Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:20:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] pronunciation and "x" To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d2616c27949c04b16724ce X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0016e6d2616c27949c04b16724ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Ian Johnson wrote: > I can say {citmle} without anything syllabic, as far as I can tell; is > that difficult for you? Note by the way that this is in contrast to a > number of pronunciation difficulties that I still have; my {x} is still > quite weak, for example, and can be hard to tell from my {k} in a number of > positions in words. So somehow it seems like if I can say it, lots of > people should be able to? Or something? > > I don't really like the sound, both for malgli and nalmalgli reasons, of > {cit-} in general, though. Put differently, {citmle} doesn't sound like > what it means. > > mu'o mi'e latros > Hmmm. Your comment makes me a little nervous. "x" has always been an annoying sound for me but I think I finally have it. Based on the CLLs description and the fact that somewhere where it talks about lojbanizing names it suggests "x" as a possible replacement for "h" made me feel pretty comfortable about it. But then I'll hear someone say "it's like the 'ch' in the scottish 'loch'" and think "wait, I pronounce that like 'lock' and when I hear a scottish person say it it always sounds more like a 'k' to me". Or for example I read your message about how your "x" sometimes sounds like "k" and that makes me think even moreso "oh no.. my 'x' sounds more like an 'h' that's kind of flemmy or like I have a fishbone in my throat or something.... where are these 'k's coming from". Oh blech. Then I listen to the audio here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_velar_fricative and read how "It is not to be confused with the voiceless uvular fricative". And I can barely hear the difference. Though if I had to say which one my "x" sounds more similar to it would be the second one since it sounds more "h"y than the first one. Blech. Maybe later I'll record myself pronouncing it and lo jbocecmu can give me some feedback if they have the time? mi'e la .cribe. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0016e6d2616c27949c04b16724ce Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Ian Johnson=A0<blindbravado@gmail.com>=A0wrote:
I can say {citmle} without anything syllabic, as far as I can tell; is that= difficult for you? Note by the way that this is in contrast to a number of= pronunciation difficulties that I still have; my {x} is still quite weak, = for example, and can be hard to tell from my {k} in a number of positions i= n words. So somehow it seems like if I can say it, lots of people should be= able to? Or something?

I don't really like the sound, both for malgli and nalmalgli reason= s, of {cit-} in general, though. Put differently, {citmle} doesn't soun= d like what it means.

mu'o mi'e latros

Hmmm. =A0Your comment makes me a little n= ervous. =A0"x" has always been an annoying sound for me but I thi= nk I finally have it. =A0Based on the CLLs description and the fact that so= mewhere where it talks about lojbanizing names it suggests "x" as= a possible replacement for "h" made me feel pretty comfortable a= bout it.

But then I'll hear someone say "it's like the &= #39;ch' in the scottish 'loch'" and think "wait, I pr= onounce that like 'lock' and when I hear a scottish person say it i= t always sounds more like a 'k' to me". =A0Or for example I re= ad your message about how your "x" sometimes sounds like "k&= quot; and that makes me think even moreso "oh no.. my 'x' soun= ds more like an 'h' that's kind of flemmy or like I have a fish= bone in my throat or something.... where are these 'k's coming from= ".

Oh blech. =A0Then I listen to the audio here:=A0http://en.wikip= edia.org/wiki/Voiceless_velar_fricative=A0and read how "It is not to be c= onfused with the=A0voiceless uvular fricative". =A0And I can barel= y hear the difference. =A0Though if I had to say which one my "x"= sounds more similar to it would be the second one since it sounds more &qu= ot;h"y than the first one.

= Blech. =A0Maybe later I'll reco= rd myself pronouncing it and lo jbocecmu can give me some feedback if they = have the time?

=
mi'e la .cribe.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e6d2616c27949c04b16724ce--