Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:56087) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RPXb4-00022L-7V; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:40 -0800 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf3416784vws.16 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=mfV2Edm2dOQnqPijM2T28+JQrEQd79fXGg1zxBdKrzQ=; b=KfMS+bVMwV1PacmIaqKV13gS5dL2gq7EAdEswSASppuWrgYsvQyDFHman2k2RQ+ju4 TFNFbWsKfL5mBu4dMmx9nb1hF5UCEiD01rrkeQeYuDWcKLzdn1nv+VZM5kJ7bl+Ip70u jbEu1gSZ79GtuJXzlJ/xvePNcjcyUdNCPKWQQ= Received: by 10.52.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr3019348vdb.2.1321181244771; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:24 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.1.131 with SMTP id 3ls3030395vcf.1.canary; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.35.206 with SMTP id k14mr17247724vdj.5.1321181243901; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.35.206 with SMTP id k14mr17247723vdj.5.1321181243891; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.120]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si8557736vdu.2.2011.11.13.02.47.23; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.120; X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dNAkaZlb c=1 sm=0 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=A_8tywCf7icA:10 a=v-e_UCCTQVEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=-wxjZT0iyQG9129POqEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:36418] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 8E/1C-16605-A30AFBE4; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:47:23 +0000 Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A59421AE8 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:47:10 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] on kau : some ideas Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 06:47:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <440e7f3a-ec47-452e-8a6d-c5edd7ed7d09@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <440e7f3a-ec47-452e-8a6d-c5edd7ed7d09@n6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201111130547.05737.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Saturday 12 November 2011 09:18:51 spermwhale.warrior wrote: > hello everyone > I have some ideas to propose about the meaning of kau and its role. > And if "kau" was a mean to split a regular logical unit in two on the > plane purely semantic ? > In french, to say "mi viska lo nu do krixa" > we say "je t'entend crier". > but to say that I hear any action or event you have been the cause, > we can change the infinitive for another one. > It implies in term of cognitive structure that I hear you, well > indeed, but that what you have been involved in is something distinct > from you, that in fact I do not hear you crying, but you involved in > the process/fact/whatsoever of crying.Furthermore, the two of these > elements is a 2-uple. > Whereas with a relative proposition, I would not make this > distinction. > So "mi viska lo nu do kau krixa" is the exact equivalent of the french > statement. > But the distinction made by kau is purely metalinguistic, it has not > to broke the logical structure of lojban. And it permits to imagine > weird set containing anything inside metalinguistic brackets. I'd translate "mi viska lo nu do kau krixa" as "c'est toi que je vois crier" or "je vois que c'est toi qui cries". Pierre -- sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.