Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:51342) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RPcNh-0003lT-2s; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:54:11 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf4980133bka.16 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fZco+DD0ddxHGyUgX7b7kO+HM1eSQHZ0HOK+d2sorP0=; b=zL/MqC2XumenpC/44qtlilwK9mmvFHPJpik2M7gt6bds+V+cspCQkdY1u1C3a6Dufv G054CTCCiq3yjrnUpDvnrNStWZ5q4DHVgyunvF2qgjxYd3rajU4f67jxcZf2d5ZCH8nO H8xa4TFS/NyQ0A4exCMYaj4GkHT67zN+9jUIU= Received: by 10.205.137.20 with SMTP id im20mr185249bkc.12.1321199634172; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.152.154 with SMTP id g26ls8041724bkw.3.gmail; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr111676bkc.6.1321199632908; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr111675bkc.6.1321199632893; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (mail-fx0-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3si9848263fao.3.2011.11.13.07.53.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.41; Received: by faas10 with SMTP id s10so3028465faa.14 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.102.148 with SMTP id fo20mr11654067lab.51.1321199632703; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111113153441.GB3277@gonzales> References: <20111112173901.GC2702@gonzales> <20111113153441.GB3277@gonzales> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:53:52 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > * Sunday, 2011-11-13 at 10:10 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : >> >> You have some hidden assumptions there, for example that there are >> actual teachers of the kind that talks to every student. > > Could there not be, assuming the kind does talk to every student? Probably not. I was just pointing out that B's trans-domain deduction relies on more than the mere form "su'o broda cu brode ro le brodi". It's also relying on particularities of broda, brode and brodi. > I don't know the semantics of kinds talking to people; I was assuming > they'd just be straightforwardly disjunctive. Sounds reasonable to me as a first stab. >> And B can deduce more: that there is some kind of teacher such that >> every student was talked to by some teacher of that kind. > > Right, except that the kind could (at least in theory) be the kind > Teacher. It could, yes. It would be pragmatically unlikely because of the "su'o", but from a strictly logical point of view it could. For B to be able get no more than your deduction, B would have to make that unlikely assumption. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.