Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:48818) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ9gN-0000t9-7W; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:44 -0800 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16sf5107088vws.16 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authority-analysis:x-cloudmark-score :x-originating-ip:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=N/sLndXhbRBWs10+obXcmp7/Pa/nT3ihVPR2C0KGzQ8=; b=Mz98iEkHARCEGLIkZ2bUxcPGrvoTmKf1NSPumRYY7qALTKu8b9wT4TQwmjpz9l1BFe T6I+zBx0wzNE9ueIdF+qjv/RdhYnY1dTJpxXulH5VdLsr+BgVdWC9qQGPUNaIt1fYB08 EQQvnwSs4NEKiQC7SDP2pDeSJmfrX9nsCfPlU= Received: by 10.52.97.3 with SMTP id dw3mr2956447vdb.16.1321327645560; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:25 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.108.71 with SMTP id e7ls6615793vcp.3.canary; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.88.164 with SMTP id bh4mr27424615vdb.8.1321327644038; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.88.164 with SMTP id bh4mr27424613vdb.8.1321327644030; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.120]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si11243123vdu.2.2011.11.14.19.27.23; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.180.132.120; Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.127.143.51]) by cdptpa-qmta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20111115032723385.DYPF22085@cdptpa-qmta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:27:23 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=H65ZMpki c=1 sm=0 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=6ti_TD8eFm8A:10 a=LNyRDDSfcIoA:10 a=v-e_UCCTQVEA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=a1IDMcjpAAAA:8 a=pEDAtPfxq3gffHLQ6WIA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:60052] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 75/FF-13401-BDBD1CE4; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:26:20 +0000 Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C751E4FF for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:26:19 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:26:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <1321289156.24832.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201111142226.11501.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Monday 14 November 2011 15:24:21 maikxlx wrote: > But yesterday as I was reading random online materials (this one - > http://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~h2816i3x/Talks/GenericitySeattle.ho.pdf ), I > found what I think is a good bunch-resisting, kind-example: > > - (2a) Transistors were invented by Shockley. > > One can't get the same result by referring to any bunch: > > - (2b) *There exist some transistors that were invented by Shockley. > > Nor does taking the biggest possible bunch of transistors help: > > - (2c) *All transistors were invented by Shockley. > > It seems that though transistors as a kind of thing were invented, no > mundane transistor nor any extension, ensemble, or bunch of them was > invented. In (2a) there does seem to be some sort of "transistor kind" > (dare I say "form") above the mundane, even taking into consideration the > possible worlds that Montague would have in his model. Would it be correct to say "lo'e za'e grezunca'a cu se finti la .caklis."? Also, does my example "lo'e .ornitorinku na fadni mabru .iki'ubo na'o se jbena re sovda" involve a kind? Pierre -- I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.