Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:39081) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RR3UZ-0006H1-3H; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:03:16 -0800 Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29sf6621502qyk.16 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:03:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ru7PLOyxDFgsE5Bcoa2T6qXHDZ+xfMdNzLUQn4LPD9Q=; b=x3Jw7NoSNFSDSonKKsfynbtKMHpe9UHCOqyzNgDVWdMuhErnqPgIXAWWVyKZbUjeBq vqcbObDVk9tANkrqE3mpu7bGrfQrlS9MDx+UZcBqvhk9gbqx2R6lgYVY93qyNo/jGAOM kSYfjhODO+QvtztOKJqph8H7/TXjaBdEw6D/Q= Received: by 10.224.78.197 with SMTP id m5mr6676794qak.6.1321542177939; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:02:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.65.15 with SMTP id t15ls443117vds.0.gmail; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.131 with SMTP id fs3mr41044089vdc.4.1321542176389; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.187.131 with SMTP id fs3mr41044088vdc.4.1321542176381; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [98.139.212.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id bu17si15342694vdc.0.2011.11.17.07.02.56; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.212.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.212.171; Received: from [98.139.212.151] by nm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2011 15:02:56 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.231] by tm8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2011 15:02:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2011 15:02:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 121774.65279.bm@omp1040.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 82920 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2011 15:02:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: L0MUrO4VM1m0gZY2y7E11bT4Dwju6X79kMKNO6Y64yD_DCF Lk4yE5mjm5YYiMcStiPDbfidrAVLFiGhMiHoXh_esDcUikoZNyTyNyUN4nhN mrRo_FmNX5EGDAA_nyZmOy8FZ6I.4K7rjz8bpLkR_WIdgUKtodogZDDCUFiu LFA018GBfd.lo0SevKC72L7pVJgekVuZ9YKXONE89E9P_PL4zHjdjk2ODWNr aGYdtYjrQn3GPBFtOECVQ5ft43tnIa24_mdXvB9bBKWKfeu00r7xo7Fi31De MHyruLZoWscDTW_CFji10y9_jaYsNn1cPgEf.O1ZIrCAOXQUj2QTpR5U.XGU c9jSjnReg4f8VVhHVcm9GUk0h5slqOUjK6QgJ0eUjTgFf.tcx_b88AK_v9rT dDyThXzpALaLMMgV3s1Wd_bljR0TTCTOr7OqXQMh2sckczBF.YPsUeWO.Da4 jaoDGnOrQvy1xo6QyU0gAjk0nTqF5lxxOKdeeLPy2zCDS4HGuA0DYHQoCDYA JFV0N2MC.VJBFnPPldCxYHfCdeWyphYhmItspEU.PW..T96uBpNf6DqUc8uj 3IbDQUzds0LBNb0si9JawGDYsHIvfuSH4SKjtA5KFrSJd_7yhHLqmjJJ8nAL 0WIKzGt62vJ44UGmIIR6_jh0X1ac- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [192.168.1.68] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie) by smtp113-mob.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2011 07:02:55 -0800 PST References: <20111113162350.GC3277@gonzales> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_11597018_AHbHjkQAALbUTsUcegrg5EtcTFQ Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban and Truth-Conditional Semantics Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:03:18 -0600 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.212.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Well, Richard died young(ish), but others have pursued his efforts in furth= er parts of English. The fact that there is not a complete Montague (or an= y other kind,come to that) of Enlish shouldn't discourage us from the much = simpler task of getting one for Lojban. Sent from my iPad On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:19 AM, la klaku wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 14 Nov., 22:43, maikxlx wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Bays wrote: >>> There have been a few attempts to do it in practice - I know of Nick >>> Nicholas' Prolog semantic analyser >>> http://www.lojban.org/files/software/analyser >>> , Rob Speer and Catherine Havasi's Jimpe >>> http://web.mit.edu/rspeer/www/research/jimpe.tar.gz >>> . I haven't managed to get either to run, due to bitrot, but they're >>> interesting anyway. I also have a WIP of my own along similar lines, >>> taking a more completionist tack, which I may release one day (I got >>> stuck on handling gadri). >>=20 >> I would like to see whatever you have whenever you feel comfortable shar= ing >> it. I have been working on my own loglangs for a while, but I don't see= m >> to be getting anywhere lately, and I have little to date to show for it,= so >> I think I am going to spend more time studying the ongoing attempts to >> formalize and specify Lojban as those attempts unfold in this community. >>=20 >>> However, there are plenty of hurdles in the way of completion of such >>> a project. >>=20 >> Yes there are. While Lojban semantics may, or may not, ever have a >> complete, agreed-upon formalization, having gone back over the close-sco= pe >> {zo'e} thread recently, I do think there is slow-but-steady progress in = the >> form of insight being gained. I think it's especially promising that >> professional research is increasingly being studied and applied to Lojba= n >> by people like you and Xorxes and others. Carlson and Chiercha are new = to >> me, but Montague I have been aware of for a while. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> But basically, I totally agree that developing a model-theoretic formal >>> semantics is (a) essentially doable, and (b) the best way to specify >>> this currently woefully underspecified language. >>=20 >> I agree, but getting everything to work together will probably take a lo= ng, >> long time. I suspect that ultimately something with the rigor of >> Montague's program, which was conceived to discover a universal grammar, >> but is extremely formal and only ever managed to cover a small fragment = of >> English, is going to be needed to formalize a whole loglang. That's a >> thought to give one pause! >>=20 >>> Martin >>=20 >> -Mike >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. >=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.