Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:42244) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RRCVs-0002HQ-9E; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:41:09 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf2601151bka.16 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CjUx2FJrLI7XClAAsoz38bSPtErgLXQM57YBigKdcio=; b=B4zSofgApCgQgJBmCzbKqu8EQi89GO6sjicYq+I4eGdkA9fcw9qmPGZI76WmXvmnMu KMZPsliJHL1/vE22mgOUSfDqf3/BOepKb71JNTBBRMVQ6KjhT/1/l57jV3RITKWiIenA pYdz602KlQBh/10TCtSP/EMzYY9YQIpJ8DgPQ= Received: by 10.204.157.142 with SMTP id b14mr169649bkx.21.1321576853565; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.200.144 with SMTP id ew16ls3200900bkb.2.gmail; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr133849bkw.2.1321576851512; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.136 with SMTP id o8mr133848bkw.2.1321576851494; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (mail-fx0-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si1933852fai.0.2011.11.17.16.40.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.47; Received: by mail-fx0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t2so3879252faa.6 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.202 with SMTP id so10mr630313lab.9.1321576851382; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1321501066.64722.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:40:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:22 PM, maikxlx wrote: > 2011/11/17 Jorge Llamb=EDas : >> "ka'e" is "fi'o se cumki". The connection with "kakne" is just mnemonic. > > Is this a newish development? =A0{ka'e} is also a rafsi of {kakne}, > often a strong sign of relatedness. Almost all CV(')V cmavo have the same form of a rafsi of something. My guess is the ones that are related to that something are in the minority. "ka'e" was obviously taken from "kakne", yes, but the connection is kind of malglico. Similarly "pe'i" comes from "pensi", "ti'e" from "tirna", and thare are other mnemonics that go through malglico glosses. >=A0Meanwhile, vlasisku, BPFK section > CAhA, cmavo.txt and the CLL say nothing about {cumki} wrt {ka'e}. In jbovlaste "ka'e" is defined as "fi'o se cumki". But since I wrote that definition I guess I can't count that as evidence. :) > Also, while {cumki} does express possibility, {ka'e}, from the given > definitions, seems to be more about ability than possibility. But whose ability? Each of the arguments of the relation modified by "ka'e"? The x1? The agent (assuming there is one)? >=A0In > order to say things like "it possibly brodas" and "it necessarily > brodas" I have to believe that these concepts should have their own > words, without mixing ability into it. I agree that the word "ability" should not appear in the definition of CAhAs, since events don't really have abilities. >=A0These primitive logical > operators strike me as vastly worth assigning two disyllables from > cmavo space, especially in light of some of the other things > available. Just my 2 cents. I agree. I have said before that it is extremely weird that a logical language doesn't have a word for the "necessarily" operator. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.