Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:48409) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RRTDf-0001PD-NP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:28 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf3683786bka.16 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=WU/Me781IqyMzwUDSjDq8WxGmUxmS7/xBuqXWbCplYY=; b=XcKrKxZFZHZ0EUHIRQnqK3Sy4QFhSzrSkShTaKCYDkTg5iXaE15pArh2KVEYX2D73O DD2v7yucRMZpKsgbmf5ihMql8Be48on5xrZaKynte85J1ghfj2EwVLHh9QDC0wlrZ3B8 IRej1Ze1umaLi9D/IZcinNkUSn4awuZ2ApoNA= Received: by 10.204.154.78 with SMTP id n14mr646751bkw.31.1321641073555; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:13 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.152.154 with SMTP id g26ls3524421bkw.3.gmail; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.0.73 with SMTP id 9mr663319bka.4.1321641070859; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.0.73 with SMTP id 9mr663318bka.4.1321641070832; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (mail-bw0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1si258701bky.2.2011.11.18.10.31.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.47; Received: by mail-bw0-f47.google.com with SMTP id zs2so3729113bkb.6 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.127.20 with SMTP id gy20mr4508444bkc.138.1321641070660; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.41.67 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1321501066.64722.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1321633769.30584.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:31:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174479b8898f6004b2068aef X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015174479b8898f6004b2068aef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:12 PM, maikxlx wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Michael Turniansky > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, maikxlx wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:29 AM, John E Clifford > > >> wrote: > >> > JCB had at least one course in Logic but in a school that did not > favor > >> > modal > >> > logic at all. I don't know how well he did in even that one (Lojbab > >> > does not > >> > improve the logic input much). But in 56 years, the efforts to get > >> > necessity > >> > operators in have come to naught -- though eventually we got something > >> > like a > >> > necessity predicate, > >> > > >> Is there a brivla for logical or modal necessity? > > > > > > Does nibli meet your requirements? > > --gejyspa > > > Thanks, but unfortunately I am pretty that this could not be made to > work, at least not with anything close to reasonable succinctness, > unless you know a way. What we are trying to express is the > sentence-scope adverb "necessarily(S)" which means "in all possible > states of affairs, S" or more longwindedly "there is no possible state > of affairs such that it is not true that S". For example: > > (1) {lo remna ne'e mabru} > = Humans are necessarily mammals. > = In all possible states of affairs, humans are mammals. > > (2) {ro nanmu je se mensi ne'e bruna} > = All men with sisters are necessarily brothers. > = There is no possible state of affairs such that it is not true that > all men with sisters are brothers. But you specifically asked for a brivla. "ro da zo'u lo du'u da remna cu nibli lo du'u da mabru [kei ro de]" Ah, well, maybe that's just me. As usual, I just try to stay away from all the "nu katna lo kerfa kei pe'a" and "me lu xo angeli cu ka'e dansu fi'o se cpana pa pijne veljai li'u casnu" that are above my head. --gejyspa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015174479b8898f6004b2068aef Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:12 PM, maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Michael Turniansky
&= lt;mturniansky@gmail.com> w= rote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, maikxlx <= ;maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:29 AM, John E Clifford <= kali9putra@yahoo.com>
>= ;> wrote:
>> > JCB had at least one course in Logic but in a= school that did not favor
>> > modal
>> > logic at all. =A0I don't know how = well he did in even that one (Lojbab
>> > does not
>> = > improve the logic input much). =A0But in 56 years, the efforts to get<= br> >> > necessity
>> > operators in have come to naught -= - though eventually we got something
>> > like a
>> &g= t; necessity predicate,
>> >
>> Is there a brivla for = logical or modal necessity?
>
>
> =A0 Does nibli meet your requirements?
> =A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
>
Thanks, but un= fortunately I am pretty that this could not be made to
work, at least no= t with anything close to reasonable succinctness,
unless you know a way. =A0What we are trying to express is the
sentence-= scope adverb "necessarily(S)" which means "in all possiblestates of affairs, S" or more longwindedly "there is no possibl= e state
of affairs such that it is not true that S". =A0For example:

(1= ) {lo remna ne'e mabru}
=A0=3D Humans are necessarily mammals.
= =A0=3D In all possible states of affairs, humans are mammals.

(2) {r= o nanmu je se mensi ne'e bruna}
=A0=3D All men with sisters are necessarily brothers.
=A0=3D There is no= possible state of affairs such that it is not true that
all men with si= sters are brothers.
=A0
=A0=A0 But you specifically asked for a brivla.=A0 "ro da zo'= u lo du'u da remna cu nibli lo du'u da mabru [kei ro de]"=A0 A= h, well, maybe that's just me.=A0 As usual, I just try to stay away fro= m all the "nu katna lo kerfa kei pe'a" and "me lu xo ang= eli cu ka'e dansu fi'o se cpana=A0pa pijne veljai li'u casnu&qu= ot; that are above my head.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015174479b8898f6004b2068aef--