Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:35964)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNXflom_FxDizpv2BBoEgS2FmA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RRXg3-0002nm-Dz; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:17:04 -0800
Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1sf4257027vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6qoIFehP/k+fWXrQSfdZRLU0INvTMsLQzQHdlODJ+O8=;
        b=uEdpNnxUqG1ipyzCc69YArTJYUg1bwvzIGMtY3csYjRlg8jYMaO/bmKcZOV3dtKqKU
         5Nr5kxbiA/LNMlfBCSpZHR1Rj0Lyvk45ERyIB7PB/KpSKu8/vN63bP0bUUMzCWQtbdpp
         uuZqO1V8zV670qsCzAbu7oJMO0x9hPqyE1C7M=
Received: by 10.52.97.3 with SMTP id dw3mr2428016vdb.16.1321658210405;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.55.11 with SMTP id h11ls6705477ank.4.gmail; Fri, 18 Nov
 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.131.9 with SMTP id i9mr1372711ann.50.1321658208956;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.131.9 with SMTP id i9mr1372710ann.50.1321658208939;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f178.google.com (mail-yx0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r67si681190yhe.6.2011.11.18.15.16.48
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.178;
Received: by yenm9 with SMTP id m9so2454166yen.23
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.199.6 with SMTP id jg6mr13507834pbc.26.1321658208670; Fri,
 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.224.8 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2f71JE6bbim_rkQqjbHAw22ch8aspMb9X5V8+KUPYaLkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20b482a7-b58a-4e4a-a3f7-27b49ba861c0@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	<201111171409.08825.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	<4d00e419-9ede-42cf-963e-7a394bcbed13@d17g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
	<CAHiXx=OjY=Pv83AbxVkk7FRksZy=FbdfvY_LLaGvxdmhnidGZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2f71JE6bbim_rkQqjbHAw22ch8aspMb9X5V8+KUPYaLkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:16:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOYwWb1dQ-TMUOk-uNy-=6U3YSrOjm2dT8ykAxVcjz224o1-jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New PA-proposal
From: maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.178 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

2011/11/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:50 AM, MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>> It seems that people are attempting to create a grammar for PA that prod=
uces
>> all and ONLY those number strings that make sense. This is worthwhile, I
>> think, but also unnecessary. We don't worry about which letters produce
>> grammatical sentences, only which words.
>
> Not the best analogy. PAs are words, and in any case letters have very
> strict restrictions on how they can be combined to form words. In
> fact, in Lojban there are two and only two letters that may be said to
> belong to the same "letter-selma'o", i.e. such that they can always
> occupy the same position in a phonologically valid word. All other
> letters have their own individual grammars. (Exercise for the reader:
> which letters are those?)
>
You have a knack for summing things up.  My guess is {e} and {o}, by the wa=
y.

>> Also, given that Lojban's grammar
>> treats all gismu equally and all members of a selma'o equally, there is
>> strong precedent=A0for not creating special grammar for PA.
>
> The grammar of PA would amount to splitting PA into several selma'o, of c=
ourse.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
IMVHO we should be seeing proposals for fewer selma'o, not more.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.