Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:44114)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCL-Ey5qiChCO0pv2BBoE2ybQbA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RRXmx-0002pn-TB; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:24:12 -0800
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10sf1332891vbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:24:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=cUrFSGmVcSY12E8XYq1tZyjSbX2w/Ev3mq6I1oCygco=;
        b=Y4UPh4unHzIwms8xJ29hbJsT5B7Z95VE7o49kekcDRMu2JUqlFhjzI+Y5YoXPtGFaq
         DXeXPSGWNREbDBJc8r8QdnddTVBUcFUcQxq99z/c3OHgrZihCc7X9HhrDiKizrmzXP9P
         W350XnuMW8bxGv4zECKN3VDQ1oeLa4ycGMEOw=
Received: by 10.52.76.71 with SMTP id i7mr1278115vdw.19.1321658638744;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:58 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.20.204 with SMTP id p12ls236001vde.1.gmail; Fri, 18 Nov
 2011 15:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.187.131 with SMTP id fs3mr7396724vdc.4.1321658637257;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.187.131 with SMTP id fs3mr7396719vdc.4.1321658637173;
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bu17si1100816vdc.0.2011.11.18.15.23.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.53;
Received: by vbnl22 with SMTP id l22so847083vbn.26
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.22.170 with SMTP id e10mr5595164vdf.75.1321658636896; Fri,
 18 Nov 2011 15:23:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.6.163 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:23:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYwWb1dQ-TMUOk-uNy-=6U3YSrOjm2dT8ykAxVcjz224o1-jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20b482a7-b58a-4e4a-a3f7-27b49ba861c0@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	<201111171409.08825.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	<4d00e419-9ede-42cf-963e-7a394bcbed13@d17g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
	<CAHiXx=OjY=Pv83AbxVkk7FRksZy=FbdfvY_LLaGvxdmhnidGZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2f71JE6bbim_rkQqjbHAw22ch8aspMb9X5V8+KUPYaLkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb1dQ-TMUOk-uNy-=6U3YSrOjm2dT8ykAxVcjz224o1-jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:23:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAP=UV6rGP7VHqzRYt_26QF5bVjViVZXp4XLrVK+yvr0LmqniEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New PA-proposal
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: craigbdaniel@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.53 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=craigbdaniel@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:16 PM, maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/11/18 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:50 AM, MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>>> It seems that people are attempting to create a grammar for PA that pro=
duces
>>> all and ONLY those number strings that make sense. This is worthwhile, =
I
>>> think, but also unnecessary. We don't worry about which letters produce
>>> grammatical sentences, only which words.
>>
>> Not the best analogy. PAs are words, and in any case letters have very
>> strict restrictions on how they can be combined to form words. In
>> fact, in Lojban there are two and only two letters that may be said to
>> belong to the same "letter-selma'o", i.e. such that they can always
>> occupy the same position in a phonologically valid word. All other
>> letters have their own individual grammars. (Exercise for the reader:
>> which letters are those?)
>>
> You have a knack for summing things up. =A0My guess is {e} and {o}, by th=
e way.

It's a clever challenge. I can't think of anything to make either e/o
or i/u the wrong answer, but I'm probably overlooking something.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.