Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:41778)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxCwiaD2BBoEjUkwAA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RRqg4-0001OE-WB; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:23 -0800
Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf7025418iag.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=x8+N9QYp7/4mwM9iiJtdfmre7gXfrWeOV78Ef5A7b/s=;
        b=iUi/iGBdZpwBbXnQzkFEBAppABXIBg2EuF9Xj3WZSLgJ6566V8Uor+EVSxjHut7/sI
         CqmOk/BUnHTjrJ2ikROX3K4qwqLf5/AaVRZ0eJ2mkK/hyHFwVYstYHuJ6wNYm+bJFC4Z
         m7C/2SYQHD4L/Qb4dpHqq1TtMxffyUXSGRnt0=
Received: by 10.50.155.196 with SMTP id vy4mr1193519igb.4.1321731248071;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.63.137 with SMTP id b9ls5774082ibi.0.gmail; Sat, 19 Nov
 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.131.137 with SMTP id z9mr11554951ics.1.1321731247235;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.131.137 with SMTP id z9mr11554950ics.1.1321731247222;
        Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (mail-iy0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4si878964ict.6.2011.11.19.11.34.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.169;
Received: by mail-iy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k3so7024236iae.0
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.216.134 with SMTP id oq6mr8975450igc.11.1321731247031; Sat,
 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.180.200 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:34:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <32839884.2475.1321723578870.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23>
References: <32839884.2475.1321723578870.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcm23>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:34:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAQ0imMEKg5V5Wrn-UHf5Rm89e371AFE5HbmRG1w-dmHxZJpgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] New logo; a work in progress
From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.169 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:26 PM, M.Nael <muhammad.nael@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone had once criticized the Lojban logo;
> Just take a look...
> It's an initial draft; just to gather opinion.

I'm one of those who don't like the current lojban logo, so I very
welcome new ideas!

Your proposal, however, seems too complex and would need too much
interpretation.

I can't remember anyone else exploring the triangle as basic shape for
a lojban logo, so maybe there's room in that direction to explore
further.

I'm a supporter of the "bridi man" concept, but the more ideas we can
develop, the better positioned we'll be for when we'll have the next
global discussion on changing the jbolanci.

remod

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.