Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:43738) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RRwpA-00038r-Da; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:08:11 -0800 Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33sf3108184pzk.16 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zCHCHgBlU9KmjYyyluVr90bmp57NznHbL8HKX1oZ6O0=; b=AE0D798+VyB1zQQUDCz0R0xj44xDT0STE0R1NgJI3cC1vCos5IYiAJ2ABi0YBxXDPS dGVORShQm/UOHmmgQHKpQbmLJ8+B5+lhMMoR3EsfY6Gli00mDcANVTcYxgMipg0k7IcW C1B4wMR0VzB0aXnk2j9Aw4SuPC2nSwQjEYYhs= Received: by 10.68.12.36 with SMTP id v4mr1356812pbb.4.1321754875881; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.121.5 with SMTP id lg5ls128211pbb.5.gmail; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr12734991pbc.7.1321754875244; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr12734990pbc.7.1321754875235; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f48.google.com (mail-pz0-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5si412202pbe.2.2011.11.19.18.07.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.48; Received: by mail-pz0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 32so10470007pzk.7 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.34.67 with SMTP id x3mr23297863pbi.100.1321754875046; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.224.8 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:07:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201111170129.40031.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <20111116144638.GA962@gonzales> <201111170129.40031.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:07:54 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like From: maikxlx To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 23:44:29 maikxlx wrote: >> So, would you have us write {lo si'o [za'e] grezunca'a cu se finti la >> .caklis.}? >> >> I believe that pretty much {lo si'o broda} =3D {lo sidbo be lo broda}, w= here >> lo broda is again is a reference to a kind with clearly _no_ >> actuals/mundanes/instances, either needed or wanted. =A0Would you rewrit= e {lo >> broda cu sidbo} as {lo si'o broda cu sidbo}? > > "si'o" is the idea abstractor; it abstracts a bridi, just like any other > abstractor. "lo si'o cmuxu'i" is different from "lo si'o selratni", even > though "lo cmuxu'i" is the same as "lo selratni" (the rest of the places = are > different). > > That said, I'm not sure what exactly "si'o broda" means, except for measu= ring > units. "lo si'o mitre" is "the meter", since "lo mitre" means not "a mete= r" > but "something measured in meters". "mi mitre li cifi'ure" implies "mi mi= tre" > even though I am longer than a meter. And lo mitre clearly exists. > I admit I was not too clear in this email. For one thing I might have misunderstood {si'o}. I thought {ce'u} worked with {si'o} the way it works with {ka}, but having checked the CLL, I see no evidence for this, so the equation {lo si'o broda} =3D {lo sidbo be lo broda} is probably wrong. What the difference is I am not exactly sure. And, perhaps {si'o} is only currently defined for measuring units; I don't know that either. Secondly, in haste I wrote {broda} when I should have just written {grezunca'a}. The issue being discussed was the possibility of {da finti lo grezunca'a} being true at a moment of time when no actual transistor yet existed (for the sake of argument let's say this is what happened). In that state of affairs, {lo grezunca'a} has no referent unless you posit that it can refer to transistor-kind or something similarly intensional. But yes other {lo}-sumti such as {lo mitre} do exist in general. > Pierre > -- mu'o mi'e .maik. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.