Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:37772)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIycn8S8DhDiza72BBoEuhnuYA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RSqjA-0006L8-VQ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:49:42 -0800
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10sf52582eyd.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:49:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=q3q59K5QTarNkTxyyNnlXTcX1Z8D8yuZkHVR2GWdb+A=;
        b=TeP85hMrH3ZZ/08+moMN1WzNEu544ZyB1rPsxxyaKyVDGRUKmmklXWQEC1rJkW8YHf
         HxbxeVvHlRC36tgMoIw9jZ9lO5CMJ9q3fk02WxA2mcrKyfuQdGWtLFiPenOqignPRBXY
         H5GBNuE7sJZVSluuPep66E9UAfZGR5+uUY6e4=
Received: by 10.216.230.100 with SMTP id i78mr154849weq.1.1321969378410;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.3.68 with SMTP id 44ls114963eeg.2.gmail; Tue, 22 Nov 2011
 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr2903293bkc.6.1321969377346;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.127.148 with SMTP id ha20mr2903292bkc.6.1321969377330;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si9458849fai.0.2011.11.22.05.42.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.49;
Received: by mail-fx0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r25so639942faa.22
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.10.77 with SMTP id o13mr20093620bko.12.1321969377178; Tue,
 22 Nov 2011 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.41.67 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:42:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYwWb2He=c995PkThJTgt2kYnMXfvjSPHusWTPT6WjWGa8hrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1321501066.64722.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<CAOYwWb2ZFLsKEhPffjO=QSGsj1c9oYeb9=femhFpO=JOAeeywQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2droqa-EGbekEK=Z-t+3C2AF0OSXKi7+87Fm3DQn_VJxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb3W=Fg08oPKgLPmwY7rvVdBfGY-RgWVVRQ0MXcF2k0brw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1321633769.30584.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<CAOYwWb22v6nNUCpC2eF6m90UQyCg_sUxQpo3A2xQmdgdrtiT0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOEKkTu-hcznZD2-8Pm8WkxAw=PzohNmRi-c1=nVQ=XE2kY9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1321640207.88557.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<CAOYwWb2ayxT+8C4Fk0LAqqW9uhQ4aak9O3dK4eh6TMcQy2DeSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CC43076C-B83C-477A-9D68-1215644C2E28@yahoo.com>
	<4EC705DD.8060202@lojban.org>
	<CAOYwWb2dRrdN8XkMuNA_5LhQeoGPf5jdNgqf5cRbZj3HzeR9zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EC79CEB.8000002@lojban.org>
	<CAOYwWb12=W2Ny6yp5buqOcEyVr-=uyMWyt-mb0P_Sk5MW1heMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EC8F072.3070501@lojban.org>
	<CAOYwWb1ACovoj_mvk8gL5+jKzSkwQsqLjoEcJVF+NMwxFDNA1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EC9635E.70004@lojban.org>
	<CAOYwWb2He=c995PkThJTgt2kYnMXfvjSPHusWTPT6WjWGa8hrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:42:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKOEKkTzZ6Tif7xByOzXhupFHdWuD-uDoQRc_oHuBaC99ZR_pA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like
From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.49 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174790322175e404b252fb74
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

--0015174790322175e404b252fb74
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

  Of course, in many cases where xorxes wants to use ka'e for "it's
possible", I'd personally choose to not use a CAhA at all, but la'acu'i (or
go to full-blown brivla using cumki), while recognizing that it's not
precisely the same part of speech, and perhaps not the same logical
implications, I think it does convey the same meaning.  In any case, I
wondered about the following utterance (I'm pretty sure xorxes would like
it and understand it in the way I intend): "va'o lo nu da'i ka'e no'a kei
mi ba co'e" (hint: it's a six syllable in English).  Is it clear? (Probably
less clear as "va'olonuda'ika'eno'akeimibaco'e" ;-) )

                 --gejyspa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--0015174790322175e404b252fb74
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>=A0 Of course, in many cases where xorxes wants to us=
e ka&#39;e for &quot;it&#39;s possible&quot;, I&#39;d personally choose to =
not use a CAhA at all, but la&#39;acu&#39;i (or go to full-blown brivla usi=
ng cumki), while recognizing that it&#39;s not precisely the same part of s=
peech, and perhaps not the same logical implications, I think it does conve=
y the same meaning.=A0 In any case, I wondered about the following utteranc=
e (I&#39;m pretty sure xorxes would like it and understand it in the way I =
intend): &quot;va&#39;o lo nu da&#39;i=A0ka&#39;e no&#39;a kei mi ba co&#39=
;e&quot; (hint: it&#39;s a six=A0syllable in English).=A0 Is it clear? (Pro=
bably less clear as &quot;va&#39;olonuda&#39;ika&#39;eno&#39;akeimibaco&#39=
;e&quot; ;-) ) </div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa</div>
<div>=A0</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--0015174790322175e404b252fb74--