Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:40036)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ_n6LGlHhDm0672BBoE03w6cw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RSqpL-0006Na-Ru; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:56:05 -0800
Received: by qyk15 with SMTP id 15sf409881qyk.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references
         :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=tWwq6Wwo0iuBBbW7mljh+IU7YI9U0ofoZ7h+ydp4iNA=;
        b=t0tqqWE1Pt7iYSrkDN54L6QCg91/5FEaZa9HCgyJZkp/OUGTHhGWN+GcUYwZ2LlnIn
         T4VFR0khsjUgnQF+7lfH9+ACg2T+e+wmRG8CvhHHcaQKHEc7PcqjAZN0owenBhC/HEOJ
         XIDowqNJLDlkWDeLWXbBE+C2Y5FtLl9/omktA=
Received: by 10.224.191.1 with SMTP id dk1mr3231620qab.9.1321970150840;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.184.209 with SMTP id cl17ls632054qab.0.gmail; Tue, 22 Nov
 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.104.69 with SMTP id n5mr7857994qao.3.1321970150308;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.104.69 with SMTP id n5mr7857991qao.3.1321970150301;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f186.google.com (mail-qy0-f186.google.com [209.85.216.186])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j29si6352706qcs.2.2011.11.22.05.55.50
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jakobnybonissen@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.186 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.186;
Received: by mail-qy0-f186.google.com with SMTP id 1so518471qyc.23
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.187.10 with SMTP id cu10mr3222267qab.13.1321970150261;
 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50
 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BWoQQtNtBdMCOJnVvqoyAm3M=5_vDseHQgJxwkAN5y=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALm==BWoQQtNtBdMCOJnVvqoyAm3M=5_vDseHQgJxwkAN5y=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <089315c1-e35b-4231-b2a8-4a813aeff88a@m10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: How {tu'e} works with prenexes?
From: la klaku <jakobnybonissen@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: jakobnybonissen@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jakobnybonissen@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.186 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=jakobnybonissen@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

Yes, a tu'e...tu'u bracket can mark the scope of a prenex. In that
case, the variables da, de, di ect. would remain the same until tu'u
is uttered.
Another way is to string several bridi together with logical
connectives: {da klama ije da cliva} does the same as your sentence.
(note that you can drop the prenex).
If neither of these two methods are used, the prenex scope ends with
the bridi.

On 22 Nov., 06:15, ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In particular, if I have something like {da zo'u tu'e da klama .i da
> cliva}, is it necessarily the same {da}? Is there another way to accomplish
> this in multiple sentences (other than binding {da} to e.g. {ko'a} with
> {goi})?
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .arpis.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.