Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:50656)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNuStaWoDxCohbD2BBoE1_JPOg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RSwjq-0001UK-HW; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:47 -0800
Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf608052bka.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zoaUTL4JQ6nQjYwCka7jXnDTygQMQ3x2wHTa92cfVPc=;
        b=GiQ9mGOZ8G9x3L8jFevZ0q+jgekTRuA9PpPmeHv/ABDhSTXTJtuGHQ0sdTa5IgENgD
         5nTIW6xgDBZ3DqY18O/SkRyzgM1VG4FrLhIg7yQWSRwC7ZlvvBdfQPSN0OO0yIErIuq6
         PoF6OoaJLnJMd1btH3AFNlI4WAJsmhe44TJZ8=
Received: by 10.205.114.13 with SMTP id ey13mr2323243bkc.32.1321992872404;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:32 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.33.136 with SMTP id h8ls87658bkd.0.gmail; Tue, 22 Nov 2011
 12:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.151.81 with SMTP id b17mr3136706bkw.3.1321992870907;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.151.81 with SMTP id b17mr3136705bkw.3.1321992870889;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com (mail-fx0-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i17si9880400fai.0.2011.11.22.12.14.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.52;
Received: by faaa26 with SMTP id a26so1149611faa.11
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.74.141 with SMTP id t13mr20293690wiv.68.1321992870576;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cpc2-pres4-0-0-cust62.pres.cable.virginmedia.com. [80.192.144.63])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z39sm10446383wbm.12.2011.11.22.12.14.28
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4ECC02A1.1010802@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:14:25 +0000
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New PA-proposal
References: <20b482a7-b58a-4e4a-a3f7-27b49ba861c0@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <6369550.645.1321835574315.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqzz20>
In-Reply-To: <6369550.645.1321835574315.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqzz20>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

djandus, On 21/11/2011 00:32:
> First of all, I=92m extremely in favor of hierarchical selma=92o.

Nowadays, but not when Loglan was begun, hierarchical taxonomic categories =
are the mainstream way of doing things in grammatical analysis. (Google key=
words: inheritance hierarchy, lexicalism|lexicalist, construction grammar.)=
 If the job of defining Lojban syntax were handed over to linguisticians, h=
ierarchical selma'o wd deffo be used.

--And.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.