Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:25:41 -0701
From: ".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLLv1.1: I need a LaTeXer.
Message-ID: <20111124062605.GH8541@sunflowerriver.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20111124050405.GM8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20111124050405.GM8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam_score: 1.4
X-Spam_score_int: 14
X-Spam_bar: +
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:04:05PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell
    wrote: > To take CLLv1.1 further at all, I really need someone in good >
   practice with LaTeX, as I am not anymore. > > Ideally this person would come
    on IRC and we'd synchronize times and > talk some stuff out, but here's the
    general drift: > > Look at > http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/tmp/cll_processed-full.tex
    > and > http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/tmp/docbook-cll-test-dblatex-full.pdf
    > > Those should match up, and I won't be rewriting them automatically. >
    > Basically, look at those, and look at all the horrible bits in the > pdf,
    and tell me how to fix the tex/latex to make it better. > > The first thing
    I noticed is the spacing problem with the ToC; look > at the ToC entry for
    10.10 for example. > > There's a bunch more, though. > > -Robin > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  1.4 BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD
  0.6 INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD Invalid Date: header (timezone does not exist)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:04:05PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> To take CLLv1.1 further at all, I really need someone in good
> practice with LaTeX, as I am not anymore.
> 
> Ideally this person would come on IRC and we'd synchronize times and
> talk some stuff out, but here's the general drift:
> 
> Look at
> http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/tmp/cll_processed-full.tex
> and
> http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/tmp/docbook-cll-test-dblatex-full.pdf
> 
> Those should match up, and I won't be rewriting them automatically.
> 
> Basically, look at those, and look at all the horrible bits in the
> pdf, and tell me how to fix the tex/latex to make it better.
> 
> The first thing I noticed is the spacing problem with the ToC; look
> at the ToC entry for 10.10 for example.
> 
> There's a bunch more, though.
> 
> -Robin
> 

There are two problems in the index that likely aren't typesetting
problems.  Looking at page 710:

 * the entry for zernerkla has an error message in it.
 * the entry for zetro has some LaTeX markup that managed to get
	 rendered as text instead.  I suspect that problem is in your
	 xslt, if that is what you used to generate this document.

Are the list of examples supposed to have names, or is it that they
are numbers only?  It probably deserves to be 2-column or some other
compressed format rather than the way it currently renders.

Are you needing help both on things like that as well as tweaking
spacing, tables, &c?  Just the former?

In this process, do you even have the ability to fix problems like
the bottom of page 513 and the top of page 517; where manual
page breaks and table formatting will likely need to be added to
handle particular special cases of how the text winds up on the
page?  (And which will of course change as larger scope adjustments
are made.)

-Alan
-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.