Received: from mail-pz0-f56.google.com ([209.85.210.56]:48943)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCOTEtqyUDhDu7sX2BBoE9JinSg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RURl9-0000qe-0r; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:23 -0800
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6sf1925778pzk.1
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key
         :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=UDWZOFcc6j7rwMrbDBKY57kVCnaKR3fRku/g0Byxczs=;
        b=yKRfJVWG1r9NsjLuTSF5eRJV0qpXnbdTH3s1QwpPFAHUg9e7JfpxH/qRZa7Gq22UvH
         UC+nA3r3ZI9l9ymOACa2uvnMnaGCE7fBJ3pRxX2QBSPPxaN3LMybSdgx5ZsCiIWunzIk
         np8rjskxJn3F4PuCRstbwW4BgEKrqOslzOdnU=
Received: by 10.68.25.232 with SMTP id f8mr1947119pbg.2.1322350446351;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:06 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.42.101 with SMTP id n5ls5476386pbl.6.gmail; Sat, 26 Nov
 2011 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.36.6 with SMTP id m6mr17547722pbj.4.1322350445726;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.36.6 with SMTP id m6mr17547721pbj.4.1322350445714;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lj6si5555572pbb.1.2011.11.26.15.34.05
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19;
Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4])
	by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAQNY4SJ015601
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:34:05 GMT
Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75)
	(envelope-from <mbays@sdf.org>)
	id 1RURky-0004hY-Rg
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:34:04 -0500
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:34:04 -0500
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1
Message-ID: <20111126233404.GD19833@gonzales>
References: <20111124044118.GF6112@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2cfhJtrvLX1S6Mga_CJU2nLyt96_4DR=ygJksH3ixaamg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111126112901.GA27177@gonzales>
 <CAO7tK2eVfy5iEv4Qy5HWhhVu+ATV3nzUJS=yqKR-tR3Tp6vG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111126154114.GC27177@gonzales>
 <1322328772.59139.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <20111126175610.GB15113@gonzales>
 <5525A83D-7C2C-4B0C-AC06-7256D1F7023B@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="veXX9dWIonWZEC6h"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5525A83D-7C2C-4B0C-AC06-7256D1F7023B@yahoo.com>
X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc
X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: vibna
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /


--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 17:29 -0600 - John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.=
com>:

>=20
>=20
> Sent from my iPad
>=20
> On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>=20
> > * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 09:32 -0800 - John E Clifford <kali9putra@yah=
oo.com>:
> >=20
> >> This latter is true also of non-restrictive relative clauses, but they
> >> are simply separate sentences: {lo proda noi brode cu brodi} is {lo
> >> broda cu brodi .ije lo broda cu brode}.
> >=20
> > But what about {ro da noi brode cu brodi}? And {na ku ro da noi brode cu
> > brodi}?
> >=20
> Well, I don't understand this really, but it doesn't seem to change
> the rule,I.e. =3D { ro da brodi .I roda brode}.  {poi} just makes
> a restricted quantifier, "all brode".

And also {na ku ro da noi brode cu brodi} -> {na ku ro da brodi .i je ro
da brode}, the noi-clause breaking out of the scope of the negation?

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk7Rd2wACgkQULC7OLX7LNYz0wCdHCBWqfGcQzrOMX/a348Mi15t
lb0AnA1e0FQC216SePqKdzUwyOmyMdg9
=Inau
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h--