Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:55651)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIywt_XDCRDL-8X2BBoEgmd0Ww@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RUSBR-0001Gi-0S; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:33 -0800
Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19sf4505874vbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property
         :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to
         :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id
         :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=rHpBg8E7YrBF8lw/C0o1ctFu8u6NzpBoE1aW7OSCjLo=;
        b=w0+scU6wq0jBQY2uvYoV+C5AJnVCO0YI865sxBdGdaaWvOHjCwzFEWgCcx7P0nagkr
         n0WSR5HHfFtA/gzUI5YxxUEh2r3thmUm4BsyYLZtJfKegXHNjVxKFkrfB995BUuurNoa
         UXn3nffcXHNQnHcE7lbjj3V8tGiCe3cpvRZdI=
Received: by 10.52.64.147 with SMTP id o19mr6710898vds.16.1322352075827;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.239.19 with SMTP id ku19ls1252578vcb.4.canary; Sat, 26 Nov
 2011 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr17813626vdc.2.1322352075217;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr17813624vdc.2.1322352075210;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [98.139.213.95])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id bu17si13529644vdc.0.2011.11.26.16.01.15;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.95 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.213.95;
Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Nov 2011 00:01:14 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.240] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Nov 2011 00:01:14 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1049.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Nov 2011 00:01:14 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 881069.47834.bm@omp1049.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 2279 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2011 00:01:14 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: zARaP2YVM1na3BLD8oHnYTxD2G3_p2wbRMGRM86MRTJglqT
 RQgHeMhKW2Mbq3YvSjU0HGuYd5h6r8FJ0MeL4Lh4uws0yvNIZAB0D89KHrmp
 XX70kDYcR8NJnlTkHSxh_2_gH7yFn00YDJ89hOrGJEEIRuyOC_Jq7oo1Rj6.
 GWvJxPdt3cNcvwuQ1sHWLdzFuWyqPNodi9hewLT8XIVEzs.7c3vWolJP12RI
 oZRGEqbSV_Ze60dGx4mCkWq_7uXjl6Q3NpduxxqwoF3iDBe3NX20ObmzvnvJ
 QQbR6xQJSwaOgt4uwTov00H.63c4JuM0QFZE6c88t6UW7I4SHliJVXhKyY56
 GqoXdL6nvlxBShxJt8XNXZ9DIKjW6Xu.GwG69cMsO6X0of_eVHL.sIwKSrW.
 eMZNw3d7.jOwc
X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g-
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie)
        by smtp107-mob.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2011 16:01:14 -0800 PST
References: <20111124044118.GF6112@gonzales> <CAO7tK2cfhJtrvLX1S6Mga_CJU2nLyt96_4DR=ygJksH3ixaamg@mail.gmail.com> <20111126112901.GA27177@gonzales> <CAO7tK2eVfy5iEv4Qy5HWhhVu+ATV3nzUJS=yqKR-tR3Tp6vG6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20111126154114.GC27177@gonzales> <1322328772.59139.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111126175610.GB15113@gonzales> <5525A83D-7C2C-4B0C-AC06-7256D1F7023B@yahoo.com> <20111126233404.GD19833@gonzales>
In-Reply-To: <20111126233404.GD19833@gonzales>
X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4)
Message-Id: <F84EE444-20AD-4C74-988C-965060B597E9@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4)
From: "John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_11943313_AHbHjkQAAGoQTtF3dA1MpFuJE1o
Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:02:16 -0600
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.95
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /



Sent from my iPad

On Nov 26, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:

> * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 17:29 -0600 - John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 09:32 -0800 - John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>:
>>> 
>>>> This latter is true also of non-restrictive relative clauses, but they
>>>> are simply separate sentences: {lo proda noi brode cu brodi} is {lo
>>>> broda cu brodi .ije lo broda cu brode}.
>>> 
>>> But what about {ro da noi brode cu brodi}? And {na ku ro da noi brode cu
>>> brodi}?
>>> 
>> Well, I don't understand this really, but it doesn't seem to change
>> the rule,I.e. = { ro da brodi .I roda brode}.  {poi} just makes
>> a restricted quantifier, "all brode".
> 
> And also {na ku ro da noi brode cu brodi} -> {na ku ro da brodi .i je ro
> da brode}, the noi-clause breaking out of the scope of the negation?

I think so, but, as I said, I find {noi} attached to a variable very strange.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.