Received: from mail-pz0-f56.google.com ([209.85.210.56]:53066) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RUUjc-0002Bb-8E; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:45:00 -0800 Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6sf2040254pzk.1 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=dHc5vm77Ex+sJo7t63ZAJ1sGGSGaNm9mS9XCm05lmB8=; b=Gud14rqtZleukpTxENqIN190tt9lrxi88Vs+Gmsuy7j2aqtSn8GSjcVXZoc37uM6Jg wZBaNQzhmCfpEoaEqtCVOAh4nnsyc+ofirUoXKc841CHmhyfhWPth82/HhPPg+ijxueZ eH5u08DnBOPUV653WKn2ys1RqFrZ0hDuPOQbI= Received: by 10.68.12.36 with SMTP id v4mr1966263pbb.4.1322361883703; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.26.8 with SMTP id h8ls5727342pbg.1.gmail; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.28.135 with SMTP id b7mr18159333pbh.8.1322361883264; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.28.135 with SMTP id b7mr18159332pbh.8.1322361883250; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si8335289pbi.0.2011.11.26.18.44.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAR2ig7V029771 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 02:44:42 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RUUjS-0001Rd-Dd for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:44:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:44:42 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1 Message-ID: <20111127024442.GH19833@gonzales> References: <20111124044118.GF6112@gonzales> <20111126112901.GA27177@gonzales> <20111126154114.GC27177@gonzales> <20111126182915.GC15113@gonzales> <0D2E649E-01DD-4DDC-B7E8-0A58E1B9E6B2@yahoo.com> <20111127020424.GG19833@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kHRd/tpU31Zn62xO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111127020424.GG19833@gonzales> X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: vibna User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --kHRd/tpU31Zn62xO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 21:04 -0500 - Martin Bays : > * Saturday, 2011-11-26 at 17:40 -0600 - John E. Clifford : >=20 > > On Nov 26, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Martin Bays wrote: > >=20 > > > I don't see why it should be even when the description doesn't > > > explicitly mention bound variables; e.g. why {ro verba cu prami le > > > mamta} shouldn't be a reasonable abbreviation of {ro verba cu prami le > > > mamta be ri}, or why in {pu je ba ku mi'o jinga fi le bradi} we > > > should have {le bradi} getting the same referents both times. > >=20 > > It is a linguistic precondition of the collapse of parallel sentences > > marked by {je}. >=20 > I suppose it just seems odd to me that we don't allow the unfilled x2 of > mamta in {ro da poi verba cu prami le mamta} to refer to da. Actually, I've changed my mind. There's a very good reason to disallow it. Having the listener glork even a constant is difficult enough; it would quickly get ridiculous if we had them having to glork a skolem function with domain the product of the domains of all quantifiers (including tense quantifiers) the description sumti appears in the scope of. Martin --kHRd/tpU31Zn62xO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7RpBoACgkQULC7OLX7LNZD1ACghK42OsKdLTsrnp1aNoVpI01Q tJkAn1RyfJNrfUdL/ngXoTaoFm+aRBRr =xHlD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kHRd/tpU31Zn62xO--