Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:55562) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RUeda-0006Br-Ot; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:25 -0800 Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10sf10714777wwf.16 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z6KjlJMyLtkPvUuv2HcJ0kPA7q2B1nH/Uo9wg7hsEdU=; b=XLfM9fBFw/nnlGD/0Y1v99gVT2J2jI3of6yVTjeUeR0XmNClHdi7KMX8i8l6g6QpvD xq3ndv8ncPFV89+o3lXHvEm7HDWavQn5iwI0wcjRmL8u7oDlfLCp2/RLT2cYZmW6NtdA SbA3BofhYpqhpo04epALZ5GFPKcZtn0hOtooA= Received: by 10.180.107.41 with SMTP id gz9mr4171654wib.9.1322399948481; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.77.233 with SMTP id v9ls3046451wiw.4.gmail; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.18.229 with SMTP id z5mr3391779wid.5.1322399947400; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.18.229 with SMTP id z5mr3391778wid.5.1322399947385; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h26si1287394wbo.3.2011.11.27.05.19.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.42; Received: by mail-ww0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 28so5624742wwo.5 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.136.79 with SMTP id v57mr1198769wei.10.1322399947288; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg1sm20163673wbb.17.2011.11.27.05.19.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 Nov 2011 05:19:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4ED238C9.3060703@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:19:05 +0000 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111103 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1 References: <20111124044118.GF6112@gonzales> <20111126112901.GA27177@gonzales> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 26/11/2011 14:02: > The non-restrictiveness of "noi" is what makes it independent of the > main clause. =20 I think that's not so. In "every little baby", "little" is nonrestrictive b= ut not independent of the clause. What makes "noi" and English "non-restric= tive relative clauses" -- or "supplementary relative clauses" in the termin= ology of Huddleston and Pullum, or "incidental relative clauses" in the ter= monology of Lojban -- independent of the containing clause is the supplemen= tarity/incidentality, which I think should be modelled logically as an inde= pendent illocutionary operator. For example "Is Cardiff, which is the capit= al of Wales, polluted?" is, logically, "I-HEREBY-ASK whether Cardiff is pol= luted & I-HEREBY-ASSERT-INCIDENTALLY that Cardiff is the capital of Wales". Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 26/11/2011 17:35: > Assuming > > (1) le broda =3D zo'e noi mi ke'a do skicu lo ka broda > > (2) ko'a voi broda =3D ko'a noi mi ke'a do skicu lo ka broda I think they're both wrong. The "noi" would introduce an illocutionary elem= ent I-HEREBY-ASSERT-INCIDENTALLY, that is not present in "le broda =3D ko'a= voi broda". Rather, "le broda =3D ko'a voi broda" involve an illocutionary= element DEI-KE'A-DO-SKICU, "I-HEREBY-NONVERIDICALLY-SAY". --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.