Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:48758)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDyjsr2BBoESPuCVw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RUjsK-00018z-Ct; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:59 -0800
Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10sf11683028wwf.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=zyrGxa7TP59kTikwaGJldvA2o7mBGoCioxfM4tghGOc=;
        b=PTsSfYJso9eBeuezRIlKBJDu3xE2H/OLIALMMHMh+hFjys+wvb4p92gbi7zJjiVDfe
         R61GMiNY77/UuAe7K4+94HzhAcCcVlHViu/DRUBLE0LOtTN6fgJRzNmpxZkT3EcQix0Z
         DT963G+6/OKSjsPwHJ7607gjjTRz4EkYJoKtA=
Received: by 10.180.107.2 with SMTP id gy2mr4316795wib.10.1322420082242;
        Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:42 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.100.66 with SMTP id y42ls287418eef.0.canary; Sun, 27 Nov
 2011 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.26.129 with SMTP id e1mr312938ebc.5.1322420081257;
        Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.26.129 with SMTP id e1mr312937ebc.5.1322420081241;
        Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a15si2174078fah.1.2011.11.27.10.54.41
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.42;
Received: by lami14 with SMTP id i14so884788lam.1
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:54:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.10 with SMTP id im10mr26311143lab.2.1322419762718;
 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:49:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111127163616.GC3125@gonzales>
References: <1322084099.71575.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<20111125034454.GI6112@gonzales>
	<1BC62F1A-FC02-415D-8863-BA795809DB95@yahoo.com>
	<20111127163616.GC3125@gonzales>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:49:22 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2edkOEx+_WdqHoesamwoJCVy2Dagdn7p1q49D4WkKKuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] No title, since the subject will have changed by the
 time it gets there
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> (Except that it only works if the unfilled second place of {du} is
> interpreted correctly... it would be nice to have a clearer way of
> getting at the always-true unary predicate. Do we have one?)

I suggest "suzdu'o", defined as:

ko'a suzdu'o == su'o da zo'u ko'a du da

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.