Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:49882)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxCFmM72BBoETcXkwQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RV1EE-0006nn-JV; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:42 -0800
Received: by yenm9 with SMTP id m9sf5702708yen.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=p+FBhN3H9K6dJFznXOkMkMBbBdJZVmDVZGw5ehfRGkM=;
        b=z6MTZNfRK+fpFZIhqCG5cnqW80aNtAOT2uClcwX4zASo+i46v6ly8dsSCvACDnaszv
         C2jMswcBwFQtVKCp4D7sNuKNcMaYFOLgHtHe0RIH4BFP+OVZyZnPwVGlRmsMSe6RwABa
         7mP8QaS36iS8idUn6wGNa6I1VX4zWNMnE0aos=
Received: by 10.236.183.229 with SMTP id q65mr10131790yhm.18.1322486789542;
        Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.150.245.19 with SMTP id s19ls63835ybh.5.gmail; Mon, 28 Nov
 2011 05:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.29.30 with SMTP id g30mr2876984anj.33.1322486788627;
        Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.29.30 with SMTP id g30mr2876983anj.33.1322486788615;
        Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chausie (cpe-075-176-118-168.carolina.res.rr.com. [75.176.118.168])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u11si4035477anh.3.2011.11.28.05.26.27;
        Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:26:27 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.176.118.168;
Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA1C17B07
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:26:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:26:07 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <20111124044118.GF6112@gonzales> <201111271513.27837.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4ED374B0.9020406@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED374B0.9020406@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201111280826.10475.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Monday 28 November 2011 06:46:56 And Rosta wrote:
> It's not correct for any grammar of English that could be induced from
> usage or indeed from the knowledge of speakers other than you. But it is,
> in my eccentric opinion, quite possible that it is correct for a grammar of
> English based on your knowledge of English, since you to appear to have
> generalized from the evidence of "quod vide" the licitness of "which see"
> and "which pass".

I did not make up "which see". It's a not uncommon phrase in written English, 
but as "see" is first-person singular indicative, plural indicative, all p/n 
subjunctive, and infinitive as well as imperative, it took me years to figure 
out what the phrase means. Latin "vide" is only imperative, so the phrase is 
unambiguous in Latin.

Pierre
-- 
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.