Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:49233)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxDUmtP2BBoEhyYpuw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RVMcv-0002KV-Se; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:39 -0800
Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26sf4548124vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=54HJlVo4I05STN3bxdVcJWPbQB00fJfLOjTr/Ob++8w=;
        b=YW9YyvNTlVafR6KE20ZR31jhLMFSlIdsBRD8u/g/RGGXbAlcdiz5g/xT2nqi7HtLZY
         RCCFewhHw5BqCmEtj3itPwa4DPv0w9qj1Wrzh21uzI8wMT+EP7V8YT9Xf9BC9aN2Bs5h
         PTB+6RxJxizsRu6oA1JI0UI0rfa9dgej6awCw=
Received: by 10.52.28.228 with SMTP id e4mr1713876vdh.15.1322569044811;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:24 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.173.234 with SMTP id bn10ls1288782vdc.3.gmail; Tue, 29 Nov
 2011 04:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr30208711vdc.2.1322569043982;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr30208710vdc.2.1322569043975;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chausie (cpe-075-176-118-168.carolina.res.rr.com. [75.176.118.168])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si17392346vdu.2.2011.11.29.04.17.22;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.176.118.168;
Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4BD21579
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:17:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New PA-proposal
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:17:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <20b482a7-b58a-4e4a-a3f7-27b49ba861c0@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <201111231005.52050.phma@phma.optus.nu> <25217155.210.1322513968370.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqfv40>
In-Reply-To: <25217155.210.1322513968370.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqfv40>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201111290717.20087.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Monday 28 November 2011 15:59:28 djandus wrote:
> Thanks! I remember finding a lujvo-making thing online that checked all of
> that stuff for me before, but I somehow lost it... Anyway, it's an easy
> find-and-replace, once I get around to it >< (Thanksgiving kept me busy!)
> Is it okay to use {pauselma'o} and {na'uvla} instead, or is it taboo to
> avoid the "y" buffering? (I'm not really fond of the sound of {pagy},
> though {nacy} is a little nicer...)

"pauselma'o" falls apart, but "na'uvla" is OK. You can say "paurselma'o".

Pierre
-- 
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.