Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:40140)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCLr6ktCfBBDlz9T2BBoE6lsLsw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RVSes-0006Np-PQ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:44:06 -0800
Received: by ghrr15 with SMTP id r15sf7842750ghr.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=G4NtJV9JlGBwL2S57zSXEkY9oYwGx3e7gB5Ow9P0mJU=;
        b=J1NImCC0Lki7wf9apRnEXtNhxuRqp65Oqk8ChuXAyvdzA4raB7i5gEtFllwXE1hLMd
         t4ptiQ0Br0/Pj7ZgrrIjfkFaJOGlnNhoy0KDBD2azLk0Dul920xqrdW0LgYrwyulFBlU
         DNv4fq+jIeE/mIjyIxKuS/De30kEB9I+2m9Mk=
Received: by 10.236.179.10 with SMTP id g10mr13398428yhm.8.1322592229585;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:49 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.2.12 with SMTP id e12ls5350639ani.3.gmail; Tue, 29 Nov
 2011 10:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr2822016yhl.6.1322592228289;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr2822008yhl.6.1322592228271;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (mail-iy0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ib2si3296882icc.4.2011.11.29.10.43.48
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.169 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) client-ip=209.85.210.169;
Received: by mail-iy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q3so501662iaq.14
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.40.198 with SMTP id z6mr38180948igk.39.1322592227855;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sunflowerriver.org (173-10-243-253-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.10.243.253])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e2sm62325163ibe.0.2011.11.29.10.43.45
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:43:40 -0701
From: ".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Just to be clear: CLLv1.1 dev is stalled.
Message-ID: <20111129184404.GL8541@sunflowerriver.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111129062644.GW8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20111129082651.GU15498@nvg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20111129082651.GU15498@nvg.org>
X-Original-Sender: alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 209.85.210.169 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of alanpost@sunflowerriver.org) smtp.mail=alanpost@sunflowerriver.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam_score: 2.1
X-Spam_score_int: 21
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:26:51AM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen
    wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:26:44PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
    > > > > I need a LaTeXer. There are plenty of such people in the community,
    > > and many many more who could learn it easily and have the time to do
   > > so. > > Most of us who use LaTeX for anything practical are just doing
    this: > http://xkcd.com/627/ > > I really doubt that there are “plenty” in
    the community who actually understand the system, let alone one or two. More
    likely the number is zero. > > So, to clarify: do you need an actual LaTeX
    expert, or just a somewhat technical person who knows how to program and
   search on the web for help? > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  1.4 BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD
  0.6 INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD Invalid Date: header (timezone does not exist)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:26:51AM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:26:44PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >=20
> > I need a LaTeXer.  There are plenty of such people in the community,
> > and many many more who could learn it easily and have the time to do
> > so.
>=20
> Most of us who use LaTeX for anything practical are just doing this:
> http://xkcd.com/627/
>=20
> I really doubt that there are =93plenty=94 in the community who actually =
understand the system, let alone one or two. More likely the number is zero=
.
>=20
> So, to clarify: do you need an actual LaTeX expert, or just a somewhat te=
chnical person who knows how to program and search on the web for help?
>=20

I'm one--at least .5 depending and just how much details we're
talking about (it's a 4GB distribution, after all.)  I'm certainly
much more familiar with the system than "type the ritual phrase
and pray for a result."

-Alan
--=20
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.