Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:49725) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RW2HD-0007y0-R9; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:46:02 -0800 Received: by bkbzt19 with SMTP id zt19sf1440102bkb.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+kVTasQPn2PRc9bY4xdpLsWW9i0Oohy2zdX3fhpA72E=; b=mfjRifhc7pAXFl4Dr6jb7KW4gOiNBvGKd1vwSs9Y31bhhINHjbJjE+fBNkbMbaS/0t cxh9TPCRlRuA42ESX7Nd7np2G794fpW5bTXS7XyqawSmZmvwIzX1Omg+OwVu0dh6gIow cUG//9euwUbR6tbrbg1hjX5O6JPo1Swsspit8= Received: by 10.204.39.202 with SMTP id h10mr793812bke.9.1322729145757; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.130.207 with SMTP id u15ls14170911bks.0.gmail; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.151.133 with SMTP id c5mr1053355bkw.8.1322729143969; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.151.133 with SMTP id c5mr1053354bkw.8.1322729143939; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f43.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w8si3760486bkd.0.2011.12.01.00.45.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.43; Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f43.google.com with SMTP id p5so1129270lag.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.134.101 with SMTP id pj5mr3925743lab.1.1322729143761; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.45.35 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:45:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111130173647.GO8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111130173647.GO8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:45:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Rant (baby related): dasni, taxfu, and all their friends. From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com, lojban-list@lojban.org X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042f9752bf7a7204b303e088 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d042f9752bf7a7204b303e088 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Assuming we were to rewrite these to include a "worn by ..." place, I'd rather shove it into the x2 and move the current "of material ..." to x3. And, yeah, that's just weird. Who's responsible for this mess? :D Also, cutci is even more annoying, IMO. On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > AFAICT, *NONE* of the clothing words have a place for "being worn > by...". See http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/taxfu , wich seems > to list all of them. > > {taxfu} has such a place, but it's ... umm, I'm not sure what that > tense is called; intentional or something?, but it's a place for the > sort of person that *could* wear the thing, not the person that > actually *is* wearing it. > > This means the *only* way to talk about people wearing clothing is > with {dasni}. > > WTF is the point of having place structures if I can't say {mi te > pastu}? > > :P :P :P > > -Robin > > -- > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d042f9752bf7a7204b303e088 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Assuming we were to rewrite these to include a "worn by ..." plac= e, I'd rather shove it into the x2 and move the current "of materi= al ..."=A0 to x3.

And, yeah, that's just weird. Who's r= esponsible for this mess? :D

Also, cutci is even more annoying, IMO.

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Robin Lee Powell <= ;rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org= > wrote:

AFAICT, *NONE* of the clothing words have a place for "being worn
by...". =A0See http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/taxfu , wich seems=
to list all of them.

{taxfu} has such a place, but it's ... umm, I'm not sure what that<= br> tense is called; intentional or something?, but it's a place for the sort of person that *could* wear the thing, not the person that
actually *is* wearing it.

This means the *only* way to talk about people wearing clothing is
with {dasni}.

WTF is the point of having place structures if I can't say {mi te
pastu}?

:P :P :P

-Robin

--
http://singinst.org/= : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.loj= ban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this senten= ce is false"
is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi'= e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. m= i patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d042f9752bf7a7204b303e088--