Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:57576) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RW9rx-0006YG-14; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:31 -0800 Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19sf2527031vbb.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Gb7cXXY4sktnQZ97RBZNmKBH33LJslIrL0RDYJ6bYWI=; b=k7sFrmZ7AxtRzmPOc/m9y470FV1ij99RoDxAsLEKcEtZsehYy1TjBmHf7sqhKvOU70 6UYZY4ELAiMjpa2QH+laIg0Hnr183/Za/LyZVLoFQTOG4hBYmh2EU6EkzQ8Vvp7Rf2rz dHRhJ0HYV1qNw3s0Pxw+AHW0rs5rCs99mBGdo= Received: by 10.52.187.34 with SMTP id fp2mr2325186vdc.9.1322758331880; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.152.75 with SMTP id f11ls61145vcw.3.gmail; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr13479324yhl.6.1322758331372; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr13479322yhl.6.1322758331339; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com (mail-gx0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d63si2220635yhe.2.2011.12.01.08.52.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.174; Received: by ggnr5 with SMTP id r5so1986552ggn.19 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr13027139yhn.70.1322758331140; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.14.2 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:51:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111201164515.GF22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111130173647.GO8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111130195612.GF2886@gonzales> <20111201041638.GZ8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111201153201.GN2886@gonzales> <20111201160359.GE22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111201164515.GF22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> From: Luke Bergen Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:51:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Rant (baby related): dasni, taxfu, and all their friends. To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b1230738bdb04b30aac0c X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf305b1230738bdb04b30aac0c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 clearly I need to RTFM again. It *has* been a couple years now. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Luke Bergen wrote: > > > > > > > > > If it was up to me, I'd define certain places as being > > > ka'e-able: that is, "this place is normally filled by X [where > > > in the case of botpi X would be "what the bottle currently > > > contains"], but even if there is no current or obvious X, the > > > capability is sufficient for the semantics of this word; zi'o > > > should only be used if the capability has been lost". > > > > > > -Robin > > > > > > > > I don't know if I agree with that. I think a {broda zi'o} isn't > > necessarily a {broda} that cannot have an x2 but rather a {broda} > > that in this instance does not have an x2. > > The CLL strongly disagrees with you; {broda zi'o} is considered a > different selbri from {broda}; see http://dag.github.com/cll/7/7/. > You're thinking of {broda no da}. > > > i.e. there's no reason that {ko'a simlu lo ka barda zi'o} COULDN'T > > have an observer, only that in this instance it does not. Or... > > maybe that's the chief difference between noda and zi'o? > > Oh, sorry, didn't read far enough. :) > > -Robin > > -- > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf305b1230738bdb04b30aac0c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable clearly I need to RTFM again. =A0It has=A0been a couple years now.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Robin Lee= Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 1= 1:24:23AM -0500, Luke Bergen wrote:
> >
> >
> > If it was up to me, I'd define certain places as being
> > ka'e-able: that is, "this place is normally filled by X = [where
> > in the case of botpi X would be "what the bottle currently > > contains"], but even if there is no current or obvious X, th= e
> > capability is sufficient for the semantics of this word; zi'o=
> > should only be used if the capability has been lost".
> >
> > -Robin
> >
> >
> I don't know if I agree with that. =A0I think a {broda zi'o} i= sn't
> necessarily a {broda} that cannot have an x2 but rather a {broda}
> that in this instance does not have an x2.

The CLL strongly disagrees with you; {broda zi'o} is considered a=
different selbri from {broda}; see http://dag.github.com/cll/7/7/.
You're thinking of {broda no da}.

> i.e. there's no reason that {ko'a simlu lo ka barda zi'o} = COULDN'T
> have an observer, only that in this instance it does not. =A0Or...
> maybe that's the chief difference between noda and zi'o?

Oh, sorry, didn't read far enough. =A0:)

-Robin

--
http://singinst.org/= : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.loj= ban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this senten= ce is false"
is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf305b1230738bdb04b30aac0c--