Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:53490) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RWADT-0006mx-Mh; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:43 -0800 Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36sf2639735iag.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=oc7O15H2K55H9/0ye1aCvk30wHcGnV3Tw59OrhBlhm0=; b=PGPVPfncRLVrkmrXd/7bAi70yRHHsVGEBqso1KOz+Ce9Gd/RHFpWo4liPidzwe0ChQ YHk4qSunAowLc/XMleORhBsFHygqwb/L8VyzCqprzo3RGcRPU3FHQ4bV2/+DVtI7o9qa z+hqVjYKIszOADhr5hwY3ed+V6zmXDn9g+hU0= Received: by 10.50.94.132 with SMTP id dc4mr1161249igb.14.1322759666801; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:26 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.21.197 with SMTP id k5ls7566319ibb.1.gmail; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr3978686pbc.3.1322759666039; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr3978685pbc.3.1322759666027; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si8141129pbi.0.2011.12.01.09.14.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB1HEPuj025179 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:14:25 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RWADJ-0002xx-51 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:14:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:14:25 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Rant (baby related): dasni, taxfu, and all their friends. Message-ID: <20111201171425.GP2886@gonzales> References: <20111130173647.GO8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111130195612.GF2886@gonzales> <20111201041638.GZ8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111201153201.GN2886@gonzales> <20111201160359.GE22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111201165455.GO2886@gonzales> <20111201170007.GI22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111201170007.GI22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: vlagi User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Thursday, 2011-12-01 at 09:00 -0800 - Robin Lee Powell : > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:54:55AM -0500, Martin Bays wrote: > > * Thursday, 2011-12-01 at 08:03 -0800 - Robin Lee Powell : > >=20 > >=20 > > > or {ti botpi lo canlu}, I'm going to be pretty annoyed. > >=20 > > I don't think it's gluteal. With {vasru} it clearly would be, but it > > often isn't important to a nu kabri that the se kabri be interesting. >=20 > Yes, that was *exactly* my point when I said: >=20 > > > If it was up to me, I'd define certain places as being ka'e-able: > > > that is, "this place is normally filled by X [where in the case of > > > botpi X would be "what the bottle currently contains"], but even if > > > there is no current or obvious X, the capability is sufficient for > > > the semantics of this word; zi'o should only be used if the > > > capability has been lost". >=20 > As currently defined, a kabri is only a kabri if it contains > something; "contains vacuum" or "contains air" are both dodging the > question, IMO, especially the former. So I think we should > canonicalize the whole "this place doesn't have to be interesting" > thing you just said. But if we go from "doesn't have to be interesting" to "doesn't have to (ca'a) exist", then the place structure does much less to define the meaning. e.g. we wouldn't have the clear difference between {ko'a zukte ko'e} and {ko'a gasnu ko'e} - we'd be left with just some fuzzy idea that in the former, there *could* have been a purpose behind the action - which if we stretch that 'could' far enough, is true of any nu gasnu. Martin --U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7XtfEACgkQULC7OLX7LNadMQCdGWDlibR6lf4af/dmBE0kpCNR EIkAn0OGxKPLrQpoxffThV5MFozAFxCy =jk+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U+NfgObvpQT1Q9Yq--