Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:65149) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RWAsJ-00076V-RN; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:55 -0800 Received: by ggnk3 with SMTP id k3sf2290170ggn.16 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Gfkvl7iA/leu1eoVBdrMU4z/l9bQSCX2O5oHMQ64EFg=; b=xRPUQYmXQylMkgAUIbZ45Nl4eo/yU8IlKg0EandaZBbliNN21874AyrSTDMcYKXx/G Q+98yDJhNwsa8P16Ofq+/+pP/GFuhJpyIrBMAveZpgs8y63tK8nhi0DI6OHGTwLkJpRZ 9FM+PDR4q/Wpv1vFvOyw9ZCInPseIDTB9hlFs= Received: by 10.236.176.103 with SMTP id a67mr3929108yhm.7.1322762198955; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.167.19 with SMTP id u19ls263441ano.7.gmail; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.123.11 with SMTP id u11mr13922606yhh.3.1322762198335; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.123.11 with SMTP id u11mr13922603yhh.3.1322762198321; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw0-f48.google.com (mail-yw0-f48.google.com [209.85.213.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b15si1313173ybi.1.2011.12.01.09.56.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.48; Received: by mail-yw0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 31so2406543ywp.7 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.200.30 with SMTP id c30mr2016783anq.108.1322762198205; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.14.2 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:56:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201112011254.10419.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <20111130173647.GO8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20111201160359.GE22210@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <201112011254.10419.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: Luke Bergen Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:56:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Rant (baby related): dasni, taxfu, and all their friends. To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lukeabergen@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lukeabergen@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68debbef2435304b30b9235 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --0016e68debbef2435304b30b9235 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable my bad. I meant {ko'a simlu lo ka barda kei zi'o} On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:24:23 Luke Bergen wrote: > > I don't know if I agree with that. I think a {broda zi'o} isn't > > necessarily a {broda} that cannot have an x2 but rather a {broda} that = in > > this instance does not have an x2. i.e. there's no reason that {ko'a > simlu > > lo ka barda zi'o} COULDN'T have an observer, only that in this instance > it > > does not. Or... maybe that's the chief difference between noda and zi'= o? > > I'll be honest, my grasp of what zi'o is/does in a technical sense is > > fairly weak. > > "ko'a simlu lo ka barda zi'o" doesn't say that there isn't an observer. > There > is an observer. What there may or may not be is a bigness dimension. "ko'= a > barda noda" is true if ko'a is small in all dimensions, or is big but has > no > dimensions, but is false if ko'a is big in length, width, or height. "ko'= a > barda zi'o" is true if ko'a is big but has no dimensions, or is big in > length, width, or height, but is false if ko'a is small. For "nothing", i= f > not meaning to negate the verb, I'd say "lo nonydza" or "lo nomei", e.g. > (losing the confusion, of course): > =97do lampagre ma mo'ire'o le klaji? > =97noda > =97ju'osai .i le vi citno ninmu ji'a cu viska .iseni'ibo lo nonydza cu ca= dzu > snomau do > > Pierre > -- > gau do li'i co'e kei do > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --0016e68debbef2435304b30b9235 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable my bad. =A0I meant {ko'a simlu lo ka barda kei zi'o}

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu&g= t; wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2= 011 11:24:23 Luke Bergen wrote:
> I don't know if I agree with that. =A0I think a {broda zi'o} i= sn't
> necessarily a {broda} that cannot have an x2 but rather a {broda} that= in
> this instance does not have an x2. =A0i.e. there's no reason that = {ko'a simlu
> lo ka barda zi'o} COULDN'T have an observer, only that in this= instance it
> does not. =A0Or... maybe that's the chief difference between noda = and zi'o?
> =A0I'll be honest, my grasp of what zi'o is/does in a technica= l sense is
> fairly weak.

"ko'a simlu lo ka barda zi'o" doesn't say that = there isn't an observer. There
is an observer. What there may or may not be is a bigness dimension. "= ko'a
barda noda" is true if ko'a is small in all dimensions, or is big = but has no
dimensions, but is false if ko'a is big in length, width, or height. &q= uot;ko'a
barda zi'o" is true if ko'a is big but has no dimensions, or i= s big in
length, width, or height, but is false if ko'a is small. For "noth= ing", if
not meaning to negate the verb, I'd say "lo nonydza" or "= ;lo nomei", e.g.
(losing the confusion, of course):
=97do lampagre ma mo'ire'o le klaji?
=97noda
=97ju'osai .i le vi citno ninmu ji'a cu viska .iseni'ibo lo non= ydza cu cadzu
snomau do

Pierre
--
gau do li'i co'e kei do

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0016e68debbef2435304b30b9235--