Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:49304)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WEMis5PYEGgSZ1X2K@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RWXgH-0001qO-2h; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:18:02 -0800
Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf1757110daj.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=xNkqryEYQgWyoyvAqD8PLasw6S0tIjF5ANYHjkKrj6g=;
        b=D1Wl9C3ebYjb9lVLyjMB5b+hLllzzg6dfesIwJDxBDjvO5V8egLR/YkQTn7ioFYoFS
         He9yfD7+egp3arbW0dn8GPduwvljDVVzgzMxtzvEPhVZIi6dfrOMnPzgJ8Qql2RuoY7u
         EKEXxG49XufBeug/YG/3yhhrf1gwfUwKsy2xY=
Received: by 10.68.50.41 with SMTP id z9mr1289162pbn.12.1322849864690;
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.74.199 with SMTP id w7ls15901539pbv.7.gmail; Fri, 02 Dec
 2011 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.209.68 with SMTP id mk4mr9407018pbc.6.1322849864112;
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.209.68 with SMTP id mk4mr9407015pbc.6.1322849864105;
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si2213902pbi.0.2011.12.02.10.17.44
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RWXg7-0001qL-Am
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:17:43 -0800
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:17:43 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] baby words: "would you like some more milk?"
Message-ID: <20111202181742.GJ5332@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111130172022.GK8581@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAPAJj9K04oYdfGLgBod-bXyCE5ydwcYhfEePStCN3D_mtjzBwg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPAJj9K04oYdfGLgBod-bXyCE5ydwcYhfEePStCN3D_mtjzBwg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:39:21AM +0000, tijlan wrote:
> I think that for babies in general it's more about the simple presence
> of the inflexible desire than the more analytical willingness to drink
> by a larger amount.
> 
> xu za'o djica [tu'a] lo ladru

That's a good point.  I'd say {ca'o}, though.

> Better yet:
> 
> [ladru] be'upei

I think I like that best.  :D

> (Probably most babies justly don't care about the temporal extension
> of anything, in which case you don't have to add things like
> "bu'ocu'i".)

What would that be for?

> Indeed, "to want more of x" can mean simply "to lack x", for which
> there is "claxu":
> 
> xu claxu lo ladru
> (Want more milk?)

Also good.  Thank you.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.