Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:56176) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RWdM5-0003X5-8f; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:34 -0800 Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf2064936daj.16 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Uig66i4qknFNnSeJIxZ6tTJN8lai2+CNZnfpP+9K5Sc=; b=BTObMF2kypCVRfP04r2viyHfXxXaC2xs0iHzXBouo0ku4lSsQblBoI5bv1vvsSCgm6 RFoEpf4ABBbdKDupgh1ElSEsrNoA7c1GqnuTL7GyhGe9H9FtwxJFhJYJ9tBRqMx/Yg9W 5kz4klQCZebBq2meyM0zxaVK9XC7lKEzpxhzQ= Received: by 10.68.4.136 with SMTP id k8mr1537031pbk.11.1322871676263; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.26.8 with SMTP id h8ls16883967pbg.1.gmail; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr11117959pbc.3.1322871675690; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.15.41 with SMTP id u9mr11117958pbc.3.1322871675682; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x5si7552175pbb.1.2011.12.02.16.21.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB30L1YR008650 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:21:15 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RWdLY-0004TV-Cf for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:20:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:20:52 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: jboste Subject: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another Message-ID: <20111203002052.GA16395@gonzales> References: <20111203000124.GE11472@gonzales> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111203000124.GE11472@gonzales> X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: sutra User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Friday, 2011-12-02 at 19:01 -0500 - Martin Bays : > (being the "Geach-Kaplan" sentence, a classic example of > a "nonfirstorderizable" natlang sentence) Oops, I was working with the wrong meaning. It's meant to be: there's a set of critics such that no critic in the set admires themself or anything outside of the set. I suspect the second-order sentence I read it as is also nonfirstorderisable, but I don't immediately see a proof... > I thought it would be amusing whether or not worthwhile to catalogue our > ways of translating this (and generally, our ways of doing monadic > second-order quantification). >=20 > I'll use {xaurpai} to translate 'critic(s)', and {sinma} for 'admire'. >=20 >=20 > (i) using sets - this is the obvious boring way of dodging the issue: > {da poi selcmi ku'o ro de poi cmima da zi'e noi xaurpai zo'u ro di > se sinma de gi'o cmima da} ^1 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7Za2QACgkQULC7OLX7LNbwDQCgpP81Zhm9z/VXD7Q3/DXda+eU TtEAn3gYclkSl5uTIRN4/SQBNjZH4tv0 =PIco -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--