Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:36358)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDF1un2BBoEgfKJOg@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RWuOG-0000pL-Lb; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:58 -0800
Received: by bkcje16 with SMTP id je16sf625125bkc.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=muBDqhub8LyYT5xk7BIthePbaVnxZL3D0YbwkyTVnMw=;
        b=SKldDtF33P+bT4PqGUOkiTPK967VTqSUos2MKXpsPlMcHe7rT1zo0dzIbJJf1zHIpF
         sbb2mq8BEwyhdGfZ8Qpcu99wua4WxIaUk+sTkTYD1h/5rPm0KIyy9Lbgb8i7SMeBaADr
         wt3lQeIfKPwiMdKH04ABHeMDPoQEICZWeU2so=
Received: by 10.205.125.17 with SMTP id gq17mr2101886bkc.3.1322937157151;
        Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:37 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.200.144 with SMTP id ew16ls2637468bkb.2.gmail; Sat, 03 Dec
 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.0.73 with SMTP id 9mr2139740bka.4.1322937156176;
        Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.0.73 with SMTP id 9mr2139739bka.4.1322937156160;
        Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1si8366087bky.2.2011.12.03.10.32.36
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.46;
Received: by lagp5 with SMTP id p5so722863lag.5
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.104.198 with SMTP id gg6mr2027960lab.23.1322937155687;
 Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111203161151.GA21004@gonzales>
References: <20111203000124.GE11472@gonzales>
	<20111203002052.GA16395@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2fdxyXA_bMKChfbZ3ayBy3BtX1Os-qCuoco0B2Draz=hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111203161151.GA21004@gonzales>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:32:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2e5ne6aWB2R6buWmN7Ap1-2Qi7NWAfP2J7fPc8vB6iiuw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Now... when {da} is plurally bound, perhaps {PA da} *shouldn't* be
> understood as requantification, but rather as short for {PA me da}

That makes sense.

(It can also be extended to the case when "da" is singularly bound,
but then the second quantifier quantifies over a singleton, which is
never interesting.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.