Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:65277) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RXD8d-0006ro-VI; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:34:08 -0800 Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf3312297daj.16 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=F/uNVUGEs+IfSpVVvfy9bEctjza9O1ynwYkIb+GMz24=; b=nrIL/gZyrJa/w3H+EVSTRRSwA0IHme54WG1pme0NyRmq0zU16E080PctUISQDBOAXe z7mnoptV9zzMHbVWx/1JtL/W4UvwOR3kkend7peM3Ik+gHVT0Cf50jOgJqkElIsF5EYS +rf4YmbcWozD2d4RaX7LkgJ9pUF/cSop6pa6Y= Received: by 10.68.54.136 with SMTP id j8mr2060859pbp.3.1323009227150; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.11.197 with SMTP id s5ls20580712pbb.0.gmail; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.16.106 with SMTP id f10mr18261915pbd.8.1323009226499; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.16.106 with SMTP id f10mr18261914pbd.8.1323009226491; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com. [98.139.91.73]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id u7si20047741pbn.2.2011.12.04.06.33.46; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 06:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.91.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.91.73; Received: from [98.139.91.67] by nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2011 14:33:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.21] by tm7.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2011 14:33:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Dec 2011 14:33:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 249095.22736.bm@omp1021.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 12655 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2011 14:33:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 8EBGSoAVM1mtJy8yZW0G.z7SaSmRhAIa4ym7CRpUcC8MaQ6 BuxSRS_cW85kFs8FiKjZPYBf8VsCb0oieJKWekrUNtR6pxkJ_t4oiwdp3RCu TIuMCZu37FaavWKGxWjc7wG7ZEr0j0cvUTFMV2yW4M_a504l.RIkbd8YGwIj eyYE3taHD8P54JiQb0ERH9dTFlBxw1emP22zYw0HSnTYUeMROLrAvJjALTZ2 rWMuSdjuDXbizOmK_kJayFTYRmgiP4OSzDoEh_qa0ETg8qi5yRNQ2iWd4PqL mMPfteuJm1EA2QtdypmvUneZEiUBoYI9XiicI4mSeRqEKfJHZvIR5eQUs2Nn bMheefeHG8PGvS4kzVrtDERm9mrAdiO9gfwoHsrBDG11H.nNWW5VQi.rO3I8 5glwMfo7SdI26m_9WVeY46fhQuAc97lyeYELZ3AaoTZKmNmard38gfzxiMUt MXAXvqx5EC.EkDZ0zDJ1EhJ4QnW.g_suJHu7la.ESCOK4_Jzw8A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [10.0.1.2] (kali9putra@99.92.108.41 with xymcookie) by smtp110-mob.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Dec 2011 06:33:45 -0800 PST References: <20111203000124.GE11472@gonzales> <20111203002052.GA16395@gonzales> <1322925914.50485.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1322933587.36710.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1322938212.67083.YahooMailRC@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: <1B82D08B-BDB6-4A51-9DF7-E851C3BADE24@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_12098289_AHnHjkQAAJsDTtttVw113R0diqA Subject: Re: [lojban] some critics admire only one another Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:35:19 -0600 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.91.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / I think the earlier discussion was exactly about { po'o}, so your suggestion proposes one possible solution. Sent from my iPad On Dec 4, 2011, at 6:53 AM, tijlan wrote: > On 3 December 2011 18:50, John E Clifford wrote: >> I think we have this discussion before, and I never can remember what (if >> anything) was decided. In strict logic-text fashion, "I admire only you" does >> not entail "I admire you" but it does seem pragmatically odd. > > Would you say that the distinction between the strict and usual > fashions (entailing and not entailing "you") is relevant to the > difference between {no na'ebo do} and {do po'o}? > > > mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.