Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:41651)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRC58vT2BBoE-b63aA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RXgCh-0002sW-U8; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:36:11 -0800
Received: by bkcje16 with SMTP id je16sf4987257bkc.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=GcBTQTr6S4FZtEtK16t9GHQtVxJ5LFkeJZ4af/GIais=;
        b=mbvBI7/2lnehl79CcDtuhgc5hLsGAlcTjM276BAwsnnPInk3FoMPKiOmNnFHij6BAv
         ns2ayVxzMdxF4afH8aZSBK1WJ8kZfRENdJygujLy+mNo8ZWr2hsRaytrIkHMRZaPbI56
         1EgvCzYeximU3OEhHh0YWzIRo1vlLeiZhbw7M=
Received: by 10.180.98.103 with SMTP id eh7mr3229179wib.6.1323120953282;
        Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:53 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.45.15 with SMTP id o15ls2593806eeb.1.gmail; Mon, 05 Dec
 2011 13:35:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.110.16 with SMTP id l16mr1276782ebp.8.1323120951899;
        Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.110.16 with SMTP id l16mr1276781ebp.8.1323120951880;
        Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w8si11821074bkd.0.2011.12.05.13.35.51
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.50;
Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so1045607lag.37
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.135.195 with SMTP id pu3mr7239400lab.17.1323120951422;
 Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:35:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111205172748.GB14648@gonzales>
References: <20111203175028.GC12482@gonzales>
	<20111205013854.GB10776@gonzales>
	<CAO7tK2ckOHBWJ6Ee8k42xwFXX8VO28s92c2URaRYxNEuWf9kxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201112042206.33954.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	<20111205172748.GB14648@gonzales>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:35:51 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2cYjVHBevFrduoZLudJxd-rQ+akTJq1uTL3PqmByg8reg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> * Sunday, 2011-12-04 at 22:06 -0500 - Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>:
>
>> On Sunday 04 December 2011 21:48:23 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
>> > Consider "ge broda ro da gi brode su'o da vau da" instead. It makes no
>> > sense to me that the final "da" is bound simultaneously by two
>> > separate quantifiers.
>
> Nor does it make much sense, to my mind, that it should create two new
> quantifiers...

That's no different drom "broda gi'e brode vau su'o da" or "ko'a .e
ko'e broda su'o da". I don't see a problem in two bridi sharing the
meaning of the term "su'o da". Where I do have a problem is with two
bridi sharing the word "da" with a different meaning for each bridi.

>> I agree. That sentence should be taken outside and shot. It belongs with=
 "mi
>> te u do cu du ra'o lo gerku pe na ku".
>
> Yes, I think that's the real point. It's an edge-case, so it isn't
> surprising that no solution is obviously right.

It may be that none is obviously right, but at least to me some seem
obviously wrong.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.