Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:56439) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RYEQ8-0000hG-BA; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:17 -0800 Received: by vcbfk26 with SMTP id fk26sf325215vcb.16 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pKAQLtr5Zkl4GEmMBOcbzIJAMLvCZ2gLIy4KT/uQq8Y=; b=k5N7iZr0LycyKxvWJ943ur9yhuiF9oZrs0m+UjYLfxvScYswrcbT7J9QZ6L38BF3wh hDvnSuyGlhX32hKsP17FT0aRWeCmyHhVfsI5CcMlsxtumdz9e0PObtHXhznxBeDHegvK S5GyQBFeaBcAI8/CZOZDYJWNNuos06ztutRYo= Received: by 10.52.92.132 with SMTP id cm4mr2176508vdb.0.1323252483005; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.151.5.15 with SMTP id h15ls1658518ybi.2.gmail; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.104.18 with SMTP id b18mr9452517anc.41.1323252482338; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.104.18 with SMTP id b18mr9452515anc.41.1323252482310; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com (mail-gx0-f173.google.com [209.85.161.173]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s70si306497yhj.7.2011.12.07.02.08.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.173; Received: by mail-gx0-f173.google.com with SMTP id k1so505901ggn.4 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.193.33 with SMTP id hl1mr2902550obc.2.1323252482181; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.54.80 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 02:08:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:08:02 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo} From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / 2011/12/6 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis : > While I don't consider the concept of an object becoming a different > one to be illogical, I do opine that it brings more complications and > is less useful than that of an object acquiring a property. That seems to involve the assumption that there are *essential* objects that persist throughout the flux of perceived changes. Is a tree essentially a seed that has acquired lo ka tricu, or is it the tree that virtually appears to be a seed due to lo ka tsiju that the tree cyclically acquires and loses over generations? Or are both of them property-acquired forms of a soil, or the Earth, or star-stuff? How would we consistently tell "the real object" (binxo1) from derivative properties (binxo2)? Wouldn't that be complicated? I said that binxo1 & binxo2 are not properties from the grammatical viewpoint. We don't usually say {lo djacu cu binxo lo *ka* bisli} (but we can say {lo djacu co'a ckaji lo ka bisli}). And, when I say {lo djacu cu binxo lo bisli}, I don't necessarily mean that "an object which essentially is water" turns into "an object which essentially is ice"; I could mean that energy changes its appearance from water to ice. > If binxo2 is just an object that comes to existence while taking the plac= e > of binxo1, then mu'a > =A0{ko'a binxo lo bisli} > doesn't entail at all that > =A0{ko'a na bisli pu lonu binxo}, > since it could just as well refer to an iceberg becoming an ice sculpture= . Although {ko'a binxo lo bisli} (something becomes a quantity of ice) wouldn't be a meaningful statement if {ko'a} wasn't {na bisli}, I see your point, for which I would more consider {ko'a noi bisli cu binxo ko'e noi bisli} (something which is ice becomes something else which is ice). > ra'unai in English grammar, "The water becomes ice" is analysed as > subject-verb-predicate, just like "It seems blue", and unlike "I love you= ", > which is subject-verb-object. "The water becomes ice" seems analogous to {lo djacu co'a bisli}. {*lo* bisli} may be more accurately translated as "a quantity of ice". mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.