Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:62144) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RYmdx-0002AN-S4; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:57 -0800 Received: by qcse15 with SMTP id e15sf2573871qcs.16 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=TKukGFvx/lIKVpNHmb/7MKWPqjH5aVC9/XzMsSvvxrw=; b=Nsxb6QmMH5DtHGgsefAv8dFWblD76ypXD3Rqp5jNppYg12uA7yEPpxR/PC+fJZ5k+l jtMAzU7I4a9lULhozZ1jwmXp9dYbSuiaMHSEDBkVMt1XKbOiEOXfPYdu1KZIMrpxq+on 9mnYbltYrv/zAvJQ8kivXaR2voHGb7O6jUXfo= Received: by 10.229.245.21 with SMTP id ls21mr147127qcb.20.1323384036119; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:36 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.209.134 with SMTP id gg6ls7024623qab.2.gmail; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.213.10 with SMTP id gu10mr7423813qab.6.1323384035522; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.213.10 with SMTP id gu10mr7423812qab.6.1323384035512; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from chausie (cpe-075-176-118-168.carolina.res.rr.com. [75.176.118.168]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ev41si165847qcb.3.2011.12.08.14.40.35; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=75.176.118.168; Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924ED22A99 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:40:33 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo} Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:40:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201112081740.30375.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.176.118.168 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Thursday 08 December 2011 16:29:43 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis wrote: > Not trying to amend {binxo}, just to clarify its implications. > > So, summing it up, the only thing I can generally assert about > binxo1 and binxo2 is that either the first ceases to exist or the > second comes to existence in the span of nu binxo, right? > > Even this is important, because it means that, no matter how I > refer to or describe them, either binxo1 has no future or binxo2 > has no past. I think that, in all cases, binxo2 has no past. To express having no future= ,=20 I'd say "tolbi'o": la .alan. binxo lo barmisua gi'ecabo tolbi'o lo nanla. mu'omi'e .pier. --=20 I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.