Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:43626)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WEKbnhfcEGgRNqdVX@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RYqI3-0003YH-5b; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:50 -0800
Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf2710701daj.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=+EISUeLAlnTPnn2urAUKBHBfy8TTQpy4L2c+FMgk62g=;
        b=ti2MVJcAaQHwtdrPt1HK7hF2FHRghlupOkWwQfbXQC1S6V3INyXSQkASR+0ilDDhyB
         hYHUVE13dPYiXR5i2DDojnBchThwQgaHu9PZz00vtNWb2Y3AvcOM4CPpDT3uxstFHX5s
         KkCLeQuSZFnRTmQWpIpffPuuVP0umjRv5TqdM=
Received: by 10.68.190.202 with SMTP id gs10mr96833pbc.16.1323398054292;
        Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:14 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.14.101 with SMTP id o5ls9561663pbc.4.gmail; Thu, 08 Dec
 2011 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.213.71 with SMTP id nq7mr553745pbc.2.1323398053634;
        Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.213.71 with SMTP id nq7mr553744pbc.2.1323398053626;
        Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6si8382360pbg.2.2011.12.08.18.34.13
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RYqHs-0003Y8-Hk
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:34:12 -0800
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:34:12 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Baby words: Suck, again.
Message-ID: <20111209023412.GL14461@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111208003015.GX14461@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAOQ8VDVBDNLn-dq3HvOpBkHosZBZ_n2nRX6QndSUbJ8exwa-0g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDVBDNLn-dq3HvOpBkHosZBZ_n2nRX6QndSUbJ8exwa-0g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:22:06PM -0500, tsani nicte wrote:
> (first post to the mailing list)

Woo-woo!

> I don't see why a lujvo is even necessary if there's no fluid transaction.
> In fact, I think that you could even zi'o the x2 of sakci.

The problem I have with sakci is that humans are not low pressure
areas, so {le cifnu cu sakci} just seems wrong.

> mu'o mi'e tsani

fi'i tsani

-Robin


-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.