Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:37798) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ29b-0001Ii-KA; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:34 -0800 Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf2854401bka.16 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=540d79xq/TttDgCPT1ToB8RgDIfyahxrmIFYZfdw2Ak=; b=sB4UCRULF5RD9H+zJblF8vRdd7ctFxUCXox5NJxP7EUg3Ci+BDevjmZraK0SadB76e VAqqk7+2jJu4IAA6fIZ15ngor2mNypkns6k3Z2K4kIcgxQKfrQoQNEL51MyRZUGoAnzZ Ur5nwV9eR3HEkJEtrjsLrxwDbT5YOp0i2GWsU= Received: by 10.204.154.87 with SMTP id n23mr1167618bkw.31.1323443657113; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:17 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.100.66 with SMTP id y42ls843496eef.0.canary; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.156.205 with SMTP id y13mr585442bkw.3.1323443655919; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.156.205 with SMTP id y13mr585441bkw.3.1323443655896; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c11si3898002bke.3.2011.12.09.07.14.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52; Received: by bke17 with SMTP id 17so4931724bke.39 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.149.212 with SMTP id u20mr4052934bkv.120.1323443655673; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.224.11 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201112090857.29598.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201112071659.58154.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201112090857.29598.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:14:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] defining words in Lojban From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d040cfa099c04b3aa3c1d X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015175d040cfa099c04b3aa3c1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 09 December 2011 07:40:50 Michael Turniansky wrote: > > I guess the first question we need to ask is "should lojban even have > > words that have more than one scope?" Assuming the answer is yes, then > > since the structure is the same regardless of the exact definition, I > would > > just put it once, and then the three definitions. Incidentally, thatnks > > for teaching me about "Crown groups". I had never heard of that before. > > So how would you word the definition? > Oh, probably something like: x1 se kamjybo'u x2 fi'o se steci la'e di'e .itu'e ra'u lo go'i cu se kerfa fi da gi'e pu'i seldja loi ladru be lo mamta be vo'a .ibo ma'i lo za'e kunji'eske lo go'i cu se xejbo'u lo pamei gi'e se ke nerkerlo bongu lo cimei ku pi'u lo kerlo .ibo ma'i lo jicyjutsi'o lo go'i cu seldze lo traji lampru dzena be loi remna ku jo'u loi kanguru ku jo'u lo ornitorinku tu'u > > (But then, back when I learned biology there were only two groups of > > animals: "Things you can eat" and "Things that will eat you".) > > That dichotomy is easily disproved: the piranha is in both categories, and > brachiopods are in neither. And of course, the human cannot be in only one > category. > > That's silly! Brachipods were extinct, piranha hadn't been discovered, and Golruk was explaining that last point when Snorg ate him. --gejyspa > Pierre > -- > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015175d040cfa099c04b3aa3c1d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at = 8:57 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2011 07:40:50 Michael Turniansky wr= ote:
> =A0 I guess the first question we need to ask is "should lojban e= ven have
> words that have more than one scope?" =A0Assuming the answer is y= es, then
> since the structure is the same regardless of the exact definition, I = would
> just put it once, and then the three definitions. =A0Incidentally, tha= tnks
> for teaching me about "Crown groups". =A0I had never heard o= f that before.

So how would you word the definition?

=
=A0 Oh, probably something like:
=A0=A0x1 se kamjybo'u x= 2 fi'o se steci la'e di'e
=A0.itu'e ra'u lo g= o'i cu se kerfa fi da gi'e pu'i seldja loi ladru be lo mamta be= vo'a=A0
.ibo ma'i =A0lo za'e=A0kunji'eske lo go'i cu se xejbo&= #39;u lo pamei gi'e se ke nerkerlo bongu lo cimei ku pi'u lo kerlo<= /div>
.ibo ma'i lo=A0jicyjutsi'o lo go'i cu =A0seldze lo tr= aji lampru dzena be loi remna ku jo'u loi kanguru ku jo'u lo=A0ornitorinku tu'u


> =A0(But then, back when I learned biology there were only two groups o= f
> animals: "Things you can eat" and "Things that will eat= you".)

That dichotomy is easily disproved: the piranha is in both categories= , and
brachiopods are in neither. And of course, the human cannot be in only one<= br> category.


=A0 That's silly! =A0Brachipods we= re extinct, piranha hadn't been discovered, and Golruk was explaining t= hat last point when Snorg ate him.
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --= gejyspa

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
Pierre
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015175d040cfa099c04b3aa3c1d--