Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:46333) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RZC19-0005Tc-RS; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:29 -0800 Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf3848220daj.16 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key :x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=DYJWfiixfYjB4pYF7+vpN16+y9ZFeljtbDn+OmHAQ3E=; b=EqcZljSQcCE3KT/6pgsRiPJmsLwWw8Wj+GAbpwwOu4BBdjMM6B2X8KEelBeKSHH8BP fC8Uij/PqZXSijNFoOQskts+9RDOTut70NAW1gC0BOyk7DYIg0sIP0oKkjaUEsvR4RTu trSVa9yxLERmczt9Hz5CvRwCl2juQ/5OsBueI= Received: by 10.68.73.228 with SMTP id o4mr860089pbv.17.1323481575209; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.74.199 with SMTP id w7ls13653634pbv.7.gmail; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.191.2 with SMTP id gu2mr3415871pbc.0.1323481574542; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.191.2 with SMTP id gu2mr3415870pbc.0.1323481574531; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si15181336pbi.0.2011.12.09.17.46.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBA1kC17011020 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:46:13 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1RZBcN-0000en-HJ for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:20:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 20:20:47 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1 Message-ID: <20111210012047.GE12304@gonzales> References: <1323373742.18817.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: rokci User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Friday, 2011-12-09 at 12:24 -0300 - Jorge Llamb=EDas : > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:39 PM, John E. Clifford w= rote: > > Yes, every particular quantifier ( and universal, for that matter) is t= he same in function, but surely not in content, a {su'o plise} in one sente= nce points to different apples from that in another sentence. And similarly= for a universal, if we are restricting our domain to just the immediately = relevant groups, as seems to be the (unacknowledged) case here. >=20 > Is that also what bothers you, that a predicate may have different > extensions in different instances of use due to domain of discourse > shifts? This is a separate issue, and then you should also be worried > about "la .djan. .e la .pol. cu prami la .meris." expanding as "la > .djan. cu prami la .meris. .i je la .pol. cu prami la .meris.", since > we can conceive of contexts in which "la .meris." has different > referents in the expanded form but not in the collapsed form. The > helper smelter rules assume a fixed domain of discourse so that "su'o > plise" (or "ro plise", or "no plise") keeps the same domain every > time. Another side-issue (which I maybe shouldn't mention but will anyway) is what {PA plise} abbreviates. Is it short for {PA da poi plise} where {da} isn't already bound - which saves at least two syllables and saves us having to bind a new da? Or is it short for {PA lo plise} - which just saves one syllable? The usage here, lojbanic history and the demands of efficiency all point towards the former, but the gadri proposal currently states the latter. If that change is to be reverted, I think it would be best to do it sooner rather than later. Martin --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7is+8ACgkQULC7OLX7LNaEMwCfR/e/vg1et3LNhEXmdF2UiSN2 vG0AoLOqiKW1eoDMOfVS0p5p4zrfdHyr =UQSy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6v9BRtpmy+umdQlo--