Received: from mail-bw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:60396)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDvgov3BBoEmEduwA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RZCiF-0005d7-F4; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:02 -0800
Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2sf5096899bka.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:30:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=1kCP4wi5Xpud3rWpFGPYF6tfu5WuER/Pi0dTEBbyqhQ=;
        b=JxvvRXmYRIdTXmeFZZhqSPmbZ3hTB0pE8fcr0cBH6sJkMadxqy0sN5yjZeENiaLnU5
         /RHeuxY7euE+9kZdydYPmDcs+1z73rD5sDC90DgnTXMrNQ/nkj52Qj08X4KwMMH5MSN9
         /V+QOFLmXY/fRNAMvQiWZomlVZv6MIUZadkkY=
Received: by 10.204.130.208 with SMTP id u16mr1305946bks.29.1323483503723;
        Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:18:23 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.152.154 with SMTP id g26ls10514250bkw.3.gmail; Fri, 09 Dec
 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.124.10 with SMTP id gm10mr187043bkc.8.1323483502513;
        Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.124.10 with SMTP id gm10mr187042bkc.8.1323483502498;
        Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si5249371bkv.1.2011.12.09.18.18.22
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44;
Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com with SMTP id h2so670842laa.31
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.146.100 with SMTP id tb4mr6442814lab.0.1323483502276; Fri,
 09 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.19.198 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:18:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111210012047.GE12304@gonzales>
References: <1323373742.18817.YahooMailRC@web81306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<CAO7tK2dghkmpansUrBCZY7HkcH0sBGWzDpv+d8hB7ge9MuV9Ag@mail.gmail.com>
	<C261B304-A8BC-4955-9016-72D1F24B5471@yahoo.com>
	<CAO7tK2eRL4D7Yy-Sz=JUcTtnwuyKt_tnBx9XjhRkzpgQmB2igw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111210012047.GE12304@gonzales>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 23:18:22 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2ce-d8OVJah2x68nuYeBcM6Qnpa+CKsHAFw1KWH3KTjJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Another side-issue (which I maybe shouldn't mention but will anyway) is
> what {PA plise} abbreviates. Is it short for {PA da poi plise} where
> {da} isn't already bound - which saves at least two syllables and saves
> us having to bind a new da? Or is it short for {PA lo plise} - which
> just saves one syllable? The usage here, lojbanic history and the
> demands of efficiency all point towards the former, but the gadri
> proposal currently states the latter.
>
> If that change is to be reverted, I think it would be best to do it
> sooner rather than later.

Done.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.