Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:38621)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNf8pM-bDBDykY33BBoEplyk-Q@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RZLXn-0007oB-NO; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:44 -0800
Received: by iafi7 with SMTP id i7sf5727982iaf.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=gMErJY8BFS0hvizOKmMeqVADlE4ZsFeozluC/nmPSGc=;
        b=fFMi3NTxf556Izy7vc/SRodeaT/uNAL7Ptw47eGG3p22wHNtxIk4O9VdqRsERCeJJt
         Q4mSb+tkRttZXZQFuw+813t73cwVnILfnhbrols/puRDzAa94nq739neNwHfwN4TQeJ6
         ScbiJvZAW6NP2Nl9upB6erE0XqnZSbBX0IBs8=
Received: by 10.50.222.198 with SMTP id qo6mr1107105igc.16.1323518194383;
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.227.81 with SMTP id iz17ls2110087ibb.6.gmail; Sat, 10 Dec
 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.53.72 with SMTP id vp8mr11644603icb.0.1323518193416;
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.53.72 with SMTP id vp8mr11644602icb.0.1323518193403;
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f176.google.com (mail-iy0-f176.google.com [209.85.210.176])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h7si3054682icn.2.2011.12.10.03.56.33
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.176;
Received: by iakk12 with SMTP id k12so7580412iak.21
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.149.33 with SMTP id tx1mr1328993obb.62.1323518193284; Sat,
 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.54.80 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 03:56:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALMa68o1wE2YQh7TY=HHshFzu1uMmZOQLQg0RWSCO5C3yYG_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALMa68qP1rans_GfLQHb7nwthw9w5zJwEfrFr-t+uRP-FXNcMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPAJj9Kk6zgouKjRyGGDybPcM49MhLa0Rf5waNML0WPFSymtZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68oGMRUwXbsSWDAyZP3GfDb4dJw7P8b1f5KhF0JEwcPBHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPAJj9JeKNdn_i0O84g9KuPxqQqfuNGyZ4Fypf7Bo3t+RLEqeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68p0LrYiHcT3=eSVKMUGLYk8-857pFAGn7+bNoedSWG4MA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPAJj9+-wgh2ggvNpPCHFv1Q78fB5xwyRN94KZ_G-0trf7LTOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68qPo96nWFvTOC5VFqANoH9WnY-0zyx1FTP9CwHdFK48kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPAJj9JFrUrTdp6-T8s0HKhpiNdFY7ELx-KGDEeNqWD6fq9MJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68o1wE2YQh7TY=HHshFzu1uMmZOQLQg0RWSCO5C3yYG_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:56:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPAJj9J6t44kM0Pz1YpyQMc8-a8oiwixBVUAMQv6+vrjJHS5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo}
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

2011/12/9 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
> Let us consider, for example, the definition of {mrobi'o}
> =A0"b1 dies under conditions b3."
> =A0{x1 binxo lo morsi x2}
>
> Where in the lojban definition does it say that {x1 na'e morsi pu lonu bi=
nxo}?

{mrobi'o} may be called a dynamic predicate, which denotes a change of
state. This brivla definitely means a shift to je'a morsi, and that
shift can be stated meaningfully only if the origin is je'anai morsi.
je'anai morsi includes no'e / na'e / to'e morsi. At least one of these
states is implied to be true pu lo nu binxo by {mrobi'o}, whether or
not the brivla's definition explicitly says so.


> I understand that the lojban definition is applicable to a small statue t=
hat
> almost made it to be turned in a live bird by one of McGonagall's pupils.
> The English one, not so much.

If the resulting object was je'anai / ja'anai cipni, {binxo lo cipni}
would be false. And "almost broda" is still na broda.


> You might still use {mrobi'o} instead of {co'a morsi va'o} because you un=
derstand that the x1 ceased to exist.

If by {lo gerku} I meant the biological body of a dog, I could say {lo
gerku cu mrobi'o} and mean not that the x1 (the body) has ceased to
exist. (If existence required a biological functioning, all non-life
would have been non-existent.)


> But this is certainly not the case with many other
> lujvo like {jbibi'o}, "approach". If someone, instead of
> =A0{ko'a co'a jibni ko'e},
> says
> =A0{ko'a binxo lo jibni be ko'e},
> I would tend to consider ko'a ceasing to exist as a justification for
> the introduction
> of this new entity "lo jibni". Of course, the fact that binxo2 is
> close to ko'e ought
> to be important in some way, but a mere approach would not be my first gu=
ess.

In my view: {ko'a poi na'e jibni ko'e} ceases to exist as {ko'a poi
je'a jibni ko'e} comes into existence.


mu'o

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.