Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:51704) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RZNP9-0008MM-8S; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:56:04 -0800 Received: by ggnk3 with SMTP id k3sf5670701ggn.16 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w0dG2SKKLuOf4CHVh3wlg85xrpohOOYq2UGk58HljUk=; b=IRkZJJHOq9ZRJ56LIatDUScXsy6b7iCUl3p0nbKIPJ32qTlVg45zXHJ/4fZKs2HDIV WDLg1EJ6h/MoNZ3TffiAWgEAczNjfOte19LTamzFmMe0tlwD7jEk2IIXOEa+0zBt7B20 SUZ7wMpYIC43q8hBoVwDR8i7vnkA4i8zZo37Q= Received: by 10.236.193.7 with SMTP id j7mr4772394yhn.16.1323525346390; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.212.35 with SMTP id o35ls10430048anq.2.gmail; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.123.11 with SMTP id u11mr20620493yhh.3.1323525345778; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.123.11 with SMTP id u11mr20620492yhh.3.1323525345769; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id v43si3382059yhm.5.2011.12.10.05.55.45; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.214 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.214; Received: from [66.94.237.196] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2011 13:55:45 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.113] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2011 13:55:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Dec 2011 13:55:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 497319.78744.bm@omp1018.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 10703 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2011 13:55:45 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: XqOxP.0VM1nDO6TslwUdfQpSMvVtp0PWOZOTmf8zvVADQMQ GVAMAclAcLwOMr_s.aEg2KhGTmQCHjjo5EzdVUFHCZeapoINOcynMyQ3aY17 7_4WZQ4xI8AmufDhqSmeHVx0HaXOlF83Ln1x0UFLq7JO0aSPbpOMLRLeoFc5 WZKE3KEi8RbCK.OP7zI_lu3Uoi8P3p6nVcEES1XvePdILoGOZxsTCpoSjxlO mOYbp5N6a0cEXkcmT28nCnuRR3VRYCAVKuKiT9Z5nsDruXoT.XHC8X0LQOMO LiCEZvYxUj7JQd.GhmM9baw6Ouk2O6w8ixmc4Lhcno6PIhB1D6xN7ZmxgXaK VQP_IRF3g3XBIbOyzNy65tdre3x9s1v4UytKZTIw9SQ8RiTfn.CvS8ArJLTS RHSljuTs8ldhzJBibcAR7hTZUsHKQf57huoK32EsGH5HUyiJ7AJLjuAz7bcP KOe7dSredLvphANA_U8KiEJW3Of8UCVYArZjjynDOSswYaS3wThdnh5FUJ7K 88PbgDg2rQe6cxTFyKpsDrzUTLyX7KaDVrdB5B.k3 Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/589 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: Message-ID: <1323525345.4939.YahooMailRC@web81301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:55:45 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo} To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.214 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / The metaphysics is getting a little thick here. Lojban doesn't say much su= b=20 rosa about what exists or does not; it (like most languages) is just about = what=20 predicates apply. No thing comes into existence or passes out of it in {bi= nxo}=20 and related predicates; rather one set of predicates cease to apply and a n= ew=20 set come to apply. That is, there is a change of state not of substance. = =20 Otherwise there would be no change, merely a substitution (read a good old= =20 Thomist on the Eucharist). ----- Original Message ---- From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sat, December 10, 2011 5:56:33 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo} 2011/12/9 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis : > Let us consider, for example, the definition of {mrobi'o} > "b1 dies under conditions b3." > {x1 binxo lo morsi x2} > > Where in the lojban definition does it say that {x1 na'e morsi pu lonu bi= nxo}? {mrobi'o} may be called a dynamic predicate, which denotes a change of state. This brivla definitely means a shift to je'a morsi, and that shift can be stated meaningfully only if the origin is je'anai morsi. je'anai morsi includes no'e / na'e / to'e morsi. At least one of these states is implied to be true pu lo nu binxo by {mrobi'o}, whether or not the brivla's definition explicitly says so. > I understand that the lojban definition is applicable to a small statue t= hat > almost made it to be turned in a live bird by one of McGonagall's pupils. > The English one, not so much. If the resulting object was je'anai / ja'anai cipni, {binxo lo cipni} would be false. And "almost broda" is still na broda. > You might still use {mrobi'o} instead of {co'a morsi va'o} because you=20 >understand that the x1 ceased to exist. If by {lo gerku} I meant the biological body of a dog, I could say {lo gerku cu mrobi'o} and mean not that the x1 (the body) has ceased to exist. (If existence required a biological functioning, all non-life would have been non-existent.) > But this is certainly not the case with many other > lujvo like {jbibi'o}, "approach". If someone, instead of > {ko'a co'a jibni ko'e}, > says > {ko'a binxo lo jibni be ko'e}, > I would tend to consider ko'a ceasing to exist as a justification for > the introduction > of this new entity "lo jibni". Of course, the fact that binxo2 is > close to ko'e ought > to be important in some way, but a mere approach would not be my first gu= ess. In my view: {ko'a poi na'e jibni ko'e} ceases to exist as {ko'a poi je'a jibni ko'e} comes into existence. mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= =20 "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20 lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at=20 http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.