Received: from mail-qy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:39402) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra6XR-0006Qy-BF; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:31 -0800 Received: by qcsr14 with SMTP id r14sf24428qcs.16 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rsbxrJuzi4l6qQ3SBgEHbQ/uQ3h3aNH/ptzLyz9lEW0=; b=A1MHP8eYVNQrxTdW2dIeg3vhbPc4O+A/IO18W/wCmzhC+DUgZHbFS0TfrQ82qLBVW4 guNEZHtDxRvrRSkNjqw75w7aOV9FffNA9YCBnZXDLVT7AEsj0IZyZcW+HGAr2j08mbn9 9HoujBeMqF+PBUsyony5o54I4C30WyhMofTj4= Received: by 10.224.187.198 with SMTP id cx6mr3169855qab.9.1323698838850; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.116.194 with SMTP id n2ls16802397qaq.3.gmail; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.183.69 with SMTP id cf5mr4451202qab.0.1323698838320; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.183.69 with SMTP id cf5mr4451201qab.0.1323698838302; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com (mail-qw0-f45.google.com [209.85.216.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y8si16731586qcq.0.2011.12.12.06.07.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.45; Received: by mail-qw0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c10so793087qad.18 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.155.2 with SMTP id i2mr25349809yhk.115.1323698838003; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.41.7 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:07:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:07:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] state of {binxo} From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30363adb07632d04b3e5a7b3 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf30363adb07632d04b3e5a7b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eh actually it's even lower than ka'e statements; it's ka'e statements involving broad classes of things. My point stands, though. mu'o mi'e latros On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Ian Johnson wrote= : > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:27 AM, tijlan wrote: > >> 2011/12/8 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis : >> > Not trying to amend {binxo}, just to clarify its implications. >> >> The Lojban grammar treats properties differently from non-abstract >> objects. We cannot conventionally say {lo bisli} and imply that it's >> {lo ka bisli}. If we decided that binxo2 be "an acquired property" to >> be attributed to binxo1, that would be a new definition with a >> mandatory NU, and currently valid expressions like {lo djacu cu binxo >> lo bisli} would no longer be grammatical. > > > Er, no; the grammar has no idea about what types of things different sumt= i > are. You can put properties and concrete sumti in the same places in any > selbri grammatically. What you're talking about is a sort of low level > semantics that is beneath most other semantics, namely what sorts of thin= gs > can do what, that is to say {ka'e} statements. > > mu'o mi'e latros > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. >> >> > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --20cf30363adb07632d04b3e5a7b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eh actually it's even lower than ka'e statements; it's ka'e= statements involving broad classes of things. My point stands, though.
=
mu'o mi'e latros

On Mon, Dec = 12, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:27 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com= > wrote:
2011/12/8 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
> Not trying to amend {binxo}, just to clarify its implicatio= ns.

The Lojban grammar treats properties differently from non-abstract objects. We cannot conventionally say {lo bisli} and imply that it's {lo ka bisli}. If we decided that binxo2 be "an acquired property"= ; to
be attributed to binxo1, that would be a new definition with a
mandatory NU, and currently valid expressions like {lo djacu cu binxo
lo bisli} would no longer be grammatical.
=A0
Er,= no; the grammar has no idea about what types of things different sumti are= . You can put properties and concrete sumti in the same places in any selbr= i grammatically. What you're talking about is a sort of low level seman= tics that is beneath most other semantics, namely what sorts of things can = do what, that is to say {ka'e} statements.

mu'o mi'e latros

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf30363adb07632d04b3e5a7b3--