Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:41818) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra8fk-0008RW-8q; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:21 -0800 Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4sf6593982daj.16 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:x-pgp-key:x-pgp-keyid:x-cunselcu'a-valsi :user-agent:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=OoUanCik1ZLGw56Bd9eaypXJoP72rFvZeZAfsWC9/U8=; b=4ZBstBjBpTcOrTMTQ2zGO8e6DtP/7oU22x89tPLfr63ki/Sp0h6P4fEV3cfaWMIz7w 30dBpXsn6U/Y3K+e88lgoNmsQfd8mM3iNJyuQrOFlSBL6fIMxhcxc3tMzAuLhCfXaGGE bv1bBM95vqOlqL11xSZz7gqbuw/moldNd8w34= Received: by 10.68.75.135 with SMTP id c7mr2177937pbw.6.1323707042317; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:02 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.32.131 with SMTP id j3ls9855827pbi.3.gmail; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.213.71 with SMTP id nq7mr9695811pbc.2.1323707041474; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.213.71 with SMTP id nq7mr9695809pbc.2.1323707041461; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org. [192.94.73.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si26220022pbi.0.2011.12.12.08.24.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.94.73.19; Received: from gonzales.homelinux.org (IDENT:root@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBCGO0gU017980 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:24:01 GMT Received: from martin by gonzales.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra8fY-0007bp-7l for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:24:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:24:00 -0500 From: Martin Bays To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1 Message-ID: <20111212162400.GA11272@gonzales> References: <1323554331.43014.YahooMailRC@web81305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1323633014.33678.YahooMailRC@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5291628E-3707-4DE5-9EEE-7FD3772C3F96@yahoo.com> <1323660683.21871.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4EE576E4.60308@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://mbays.freeshell.org/pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyId: B5FB2CD6 X-cunselcu'a-valsi: dansu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of mbays@sdf.org designates 192.94.73.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / * Monday, 2011-12-12 at 09:16 -0600 - John E. Clifford : > Well, point one goes against orthodoxy for languages in general and > certainly for Lojban in particular. Point two is generally true, but > much harder is not impossible. In general, the move from FOL to > Lojban ought to seem easier than the reverse, but even that may be > illusory. I'm not sure what you're getting at here. FOL to Lojban is entirely trivial. Assuming a relational language and that every relation is the interpretation of some selbri: use {su'o da zo'u} and {ro da zo'u} for the quantifiers, and use geks for the boolean operations. There are no issues at all. Martin > On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:37 PM, vitci'i wrote: > > > On 12/11/2011 09:31 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > >> Wait. If we have a means of converting FOL into Lojban, it has -- to be > >> acceptable -- to provide a rule for a means of converting some logical > >> expression into each Lojban sentence. So, in particular, it has to provide a > >> systematic explanation for even those sentences which are problematic to the > >> back conversion. > > > > That doesn't follow. There may be some well-formed Lojban expressions > > that are not produced by converting any FOL expression. Alternatively, > > there exist some relations which are much harder to compute in one > > direction than the other. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.