Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:59544) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RaeiK-0007tU-3M; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:37:08 -0800 Received: by pbcc3 with SMTP id c3sf643809pbc.16 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:user-agent:sender:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=8O//aiIpKRmKBR//b3Cf7Ai1Pr7eNW8ViMOJ28v+sKg=; b=gFyQd+PRQM3hWAgNfolntH0R8bBEGRASaE0b5YOsnGBUkJsDLvjAppcSV9D8pb0fiR r1QndxD7NtkkliQtaEcUvrTKfrJoAQmLQXsSY+x8env0T9gME3RbBPn4YtOVxHME69kI iMe9rdaqdFm9HXej8nGWXfSd7H+9aiBEVyaJE= Received: by 10.68.74.34 with SMTP id q2mr46494pbv.2.1323830209524; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:49 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.14.101 with SMTP id o5ls4768273pbc.4.gmail; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.189.233 with SMTP id gl9mr420841pbc.8.1323830208116; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.189.233 with SMTP id gl9mr420840pbc.8.1323830208104; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si5155965pbi.0.2011.12.13.18.36.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Raei6-0007tO-R2 for lojban@googlegroups.com; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:46 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Raei6-0007tH-CP for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:46 -0800 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:36:46 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] "If", da'i, and mu'ei Message-ID: <20111214023645.GB21878@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I've been pondering subjunctives ("I'll go if you go") for a few days now, and have come to the following conclusions that I randomly feel like sharing: 1. Doing them in bridi is pretty easy; {lakne} and {cumki} both work very well. [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.61 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature I've been pondering subjunctives ("I'll go if you go") for a few days now, and have come to the following conclusions that I randomly feel like sharing: 1. Doing them in bridi is pretty easy; {lakne} and {cumki} both work very well. 2. What I had been doing, which is {da'i}, does not; {da'i mi klama mu'i lo nu do klama} can be translated as I said, but it could also be translated as "maybe I go because you go", which is sort-of right?, but isn't obviously subjunctive. The problem is that {da'i} can be used for simply-untrue stuff, rather than untrue stuff that is tied to the rest of the sentence and could be true under the right conditions. 3. I finally read up on mu'ei ( http://www.lojban.org/tiki/mu'ei ). I like it. I think I'll start using it. 4. Whoever first called logical conditionals "if" in English needs to be stabbed over and over and over. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.