Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:58845)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WEPSwrvcEGgSU95S0@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1RbdEM-0006IN-2B; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:14:13 -0800
Received: by pbcc3 with SMTP id c3sf2435825pbc.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:14:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=GAzv8b2uVUsAJ5TV1QSf/SHveNJ9bcz2GULxfS39GyU=;
        b=c6d3oExI23nMfBj9g1+Eq+pLDJE5/L/7E2a+iCZt80USBjogUeR9CJaXHkx1GDR/u5
         v+aTjjA2TriiQKw6ixsnOKQGiRZK4ZALtt+Xw2JEDNeADdga0i9d/h7vpDzGIC3LScip
         aAi784j7CoFbZpWwupIJal2Sx/F1e50Pj1PHo=
Received: by 10.68.190.196 with SMTP id gs4mr2520950pbc.12.1324062836221;
        Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:56 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.118.41 with SMTP id kj9ls15870625pbb.1.gmail; Fri, 16 Dec
 2011 11:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.189.194 with SMTP id gk2mr9555362pbc.3.1324062835627;
        Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.189.194 with SMTP id gk2mr9555361pbc.3.1324062835618;
        Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z2si11564270pbn.1.2011.12.16.11.13.55
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1RbdE9-0006II-UH
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:54 -0800
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:53 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Baby words: "I accept" as a selbri?
Message-ID: <20111216191353.GB22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20111214183256.GG21878@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAO7tK2fgJsN_kODAPXdj-G0yXSTNCQHUK5=JrfoNgn_zL=4otA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111214224426.GR21878@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAKOEKkQyS4x_pFq6FmQEMaQFTFTxHm9o66OuN5NyOYVt=nxw4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111215195633.GZ21878@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAMKwHj1k2davrOiEVOa17k=YipeWmRmmf77f=c5htFQXvksiFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOQ8VDXM=x8HiHJwmUeay=WpicdNOP1q5Zp0LZDmns11OktDKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111216164308.GE14109@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20111216184105.GX15498@nvg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20111216184105.GX15498@nvg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:41:05PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen
    wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:43:09AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
    > > But I *didn't* want to, that's the whole problem. > > > > "I don't refuse"
    would work, but we don't have that either. -_- > > > > tugni is the wrong
    kind of "agree". > > nalpro, to'e xarnu? randa zei bredi? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [209.85.160.61 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
                [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.160.61>]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:41:05PM +0100, Arnt Richard Johansen
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:43:09AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > But I *didn't* want to, that's the whole problem.
> > 
> > "I don't refuse" would work, but we don't have that either.  -_-
> > 
> > tugni is the wrong kind of "agree".
> 
> nalpro, to'e xarnu? randa zei bredi?

{randa} is actually really good for my original meaning.

{no'e xarnu} does "willing" in general well enough, I think; {to'e}
is too strong, that's more like "intend".

Thanks!

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.