Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:62565) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RcNpH-00059L-Ft; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:20 -0800 Received: by eaaa13 with SMTP id a13sf4015779eaa.16 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=I1rPpT0BxCfyGOurfQG+G+Qqfs+O3/UfOD9rv2q8SpQ=; b=xUfp6D5kobOMqF7rDM3RChiro4KCqBNY19xg4ki+1LfjYAhq+dxS6lw7s3pJ2Op5hL pHtnTw5G3o4cqJ19q3+O2beiJGSzlcc/fQDsFMMq91AhJeURx4MO0R9Zp00y1pcv+7ed uiDgd5d2FW6EmAOjlRDEP+SnheXW57pauENxI= Received: by 10.204.151.193 with SMTP id d1mr2204728bkw.27.1324241947975; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:07 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.200.144 with SMTP id ew16ls15489192bkb.2.gmail; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.136.10 with SMTP id ii10mr149198bkc.7.1324241946846; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.136.10 with SMTP id ii10mr149197bkc.7.1324241946826; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f45.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1si14716381bky.2.2011.12.18.12.59.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.45; Received: by lags15 with SMTP id s15so2211370lag.4 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.130 with SMTP id ge2mr14295561lab.43.1324241946304; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.114.230 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:59:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:59:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Metalinguistic sumti-to-selbri operator From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408d3c1ce61e904b4641aef X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d0408d3c1ce61e904b4641aef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I don't think I understand this. How would you say what {.i do ko'a me'ei lo melbi} says without using me'ei? On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > I think we should have a generic operator for converting a sumti referring > to a selbri into a selbri. I propose calling it {me'ei}. It'd be part of > ME. > > For example, > > i do ko'a me'ei lo melbi > You have a beautiful relation to ko'a. > > i pe'i la xalbo na me'ei lo smuni be lo cmene be vo'a > I don't think xalbo lives up to his name. > > This plugs a language hole that may be somewhat theoretical but in my > opinion > is pretty fundamental. It also provides a way to define things like > {me'oi}: > > {me'oi foo} = {me'ei lo smuni be zo'oi foo} > > And if you don't like {bu'a}, which is a bit awkward to quantify, > depending on > your standard for awkwardness, you can just use {me'ei da}. > > All in all, it's a powerful tool for talking about and manipulating > predicates. > > For example, one could define a brivla like this: > > {kibro} = {me'ei lo smuni be zo kibro bei la jbovlaste} > > Now, maybe that's not how you interpret it, but at least now you can > talk about it in a precise manner. > > Thoughts? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d0408d3c1ce61e904b4641aef Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think I understand this. How would you say what {.i do ko'a= me'ei lo melbi} says without using me'ei?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
I think we should have a generic operator fo= r converting a sumti referring
to a selbri into a selbri. =A0I propose calling it {me'ei}. =A0It'd= be part of ME.

For example,

=A0 =A0i do ko'a me'ei lo melbi
=A0 =A0You have a beautiful relation to ko'a.

=A0 =A0i pe'i la xalbo na me'ei lo smuni be lo cmene be vo'a =A0 =A0I don't think xalbo lives up to his name.

This plugs a language hole that may be somewhat theoretical but in my opini= on
is pretty fundamental. =A0It also provides a way to define things like {me&= #39;oi}:

=A0 =A0{me'oi foo} =3D {me'ei lo smuni be zo'oi foo}

And if you don't like {bu'a}, which is a bit awkward to quantify, d= epending on
your standard for awkwardness, you can just use {me'ei da}.

All in all, it's a powerful tool for talking about and manipulating pre= dicates.

For example, one could define a brivla like this:

=A0 =A0{kibro} =3D {me'ei lo smuni be zo kibro bei la jbovlaste}

Now, maybe that's not how you interpret it, but at least now you can talk about it in a precise manner.

Thoughts?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi'= e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. m= i patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d0408d3c1ce61e904b4641aef--